User talk:DrCroco

The requirement to pass speedy is no assertion or indction of importance. If you think an article shows importance inadequately, use WP:AFD. DGG (talk) 00:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I call your attention to your possible violation of WP:COI with respect to the article on InteLib‎. I suggest that if it is notable you may want to add some additional references to the article from third parties. DGG (talk) 00:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of InteLib (software library)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article InteLib (software library), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BradV 01:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of InteLib (software library)

I have nominated InteLib (software library), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InteLib (software library). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BradV 16:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]