Jump to content

User talk:Dr.Rezowan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Md. Rezowan Ahmed (May 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dr.Rezowan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Pbrks (t • c) 20:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md. Rezowan Ahmed is a popular author, can't I write about him and his contribution to the book & music industry? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bdembassyusa.org/?page=father-of-the-nation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justiyaya 02:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I edit or recreate my article with appropriate documentation? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hello, I'm waiting for your reply Sir/Ma'am Dr.Rezowan (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
  • It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of bdembassyusa.org/?page=father-of-the-nation. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
    If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Md. Rezowan Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why my account blocked I just don't know. I provide all the contributions in the articles with solid sources. If you guys think it is the wrong info then let me or just search in google about it. You just claim that I'm advertising or something else. I'm an author and writer, I know the value of Wikipedia & I won't write here any unusual or unpreferable things here. So I humbly request to unblock my account. Thank you. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 20:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand what was wrong with your edits. Yamla (talk) 20:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I gave a solid news source about my edits, what was wrong with it? Can you clarify? I want to work on Wikipedia, what should I do now? Dr.Rezowan (talk) 20:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. We also don't get to promote our own books on Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm paid to write about those items, those books aren't mine. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This makes things worse, as your username is now improper(since you are not Dr. Rezowan) and you will need to tell us a new username this account can be renamed to- and you are admitting to undisclosed paid editing in violation of WP:PAID. Clearly you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia at this time, not until you better understand the relevant policies. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Wiki allowed the paid edits rights? Then what's the problem with my edits then. Cause I didn't publish any wrong thing. All are sourced from international news and press releases. Moreover "The worldwide Bangabandhu: Story of an inspirational figure." book is a top-rated book in Bangladesh, it describes the contributions of the national father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and has written just an article about it with all proper information, it's not under any promotion or advertisement. Dr.Rezowan (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Paid editing is only allowed if you disclose your employer, and client. See WP:PAID. Your edits were considered promotional by multiple admins, so you need to commit to change your edits. You have not proposed a new username. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any wrong thing?

[edit]

You mean aside form promotional edits and WP:COPYVIO's -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Rezowan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Where can I appeal for my username change? I wanna work on Wikipedia so I have to unblock myself; can anyone help me out, please?

Decline reason:

If you want to request a different username, I or another can execute that for you. However, given that you still haven't demonstrated an understanding of why you were blocked, then it will be unlikely for you to be unblocked at all and I, at least, would not unblock you to be a paid editor - a nature that has various additional rules. For example, when you made your current account, you agreed to a terms of use document with a specific set of restrictions on paid editing, and have been breaching them all this time. These two issues together make us nervous that you would manage to comply with all the core rules should you be unblocked. In normal practice, I'd advise any unblocking admin to not unblock without a prohibition for paid editing until the editor had demonstrated an ability to source correctly. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See and read the details at Wikipedia:Changing username, then make your request here. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, your username has to meet the username policy. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]