User talk:Dpotter
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Dpotter has not edited Wikipedia since 7 December 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Introduction
[edit]Leave any comments regarding my edits on this page, please.
Tools
[edit]Hi. I also use CryptoDerk's Vandal Fighter for spotting vandalism (a good tip is to add editors who you see making frequent reverts of vandalism to you "whitelist", then configure the tool to highlights edits by those users who have been reverted by editors on your whitelist - you'll then spot repeat vandals more easily).
For reverting, I use the "Godmode light" script - created by Sam Hocevar.
For adding comments to user talk pages I simply have the following text in notepad, which I copy and alter as required.
{{subst:test1-n|}} ~~~~
There is probably a script that I could use to make this easier, but I haven't looked into it. You might want to have a look in Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts and see what you can find.
Hope this helps! Cheers TigerShark 03:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Magi Media has a reply for you. See his user talk:Magi Media
Howdy! I've noticed your contribution on several wine articles, including Pinot Noir and would like to invite you to join the Wikipedia WineProject. One of the task that we are currently trying to do is get Pinot Noir up to Feature Article status. We would love to have you on the Team. :) Agne 10:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
[edit]This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Cat 5 cable max length
[edit]Dude:
Why did you say 90m is the length limit for Ethernet Cat 5 cable, when IEEE Std 802.3-2005 (along with every other source on the internet) says it is 100m for 100BASE-TX & 1000BASE-T? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.62.217.13 (talk • contribs) .
- There are two sources of apparent confusion in your question:
- Firstly, don't confuse UTP cables with Ethernet cables. One of the goals of structured cabling systems is to provide an infrastructure that supports multiple services, not just Ethernet. IEEE defines Ethernet, but TIA-568B defines structured cabling. IEEE-802.3 references TIA-568B.1 for cabling specifications.
- Secondly, don't confuse channels with horizontal cables. The maximum length of the entire channel (horizontal cable + patch cords + work area cables + equipment cables) varies from as low as 98m to as much as 100m, depending upon the length of the horizontal cable. The horizontal cable can never be longer than 90m.
- Hope this helps!
- dpotter 17:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks =)
[edit]Thanks for keeping Wikipedia a cleaner place, and for helping clean up the childish vandalisms! SwiftGeneration 20:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
New Wine Discussion (by Agne) : Input Requested
[edit]Dear Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wine member:
There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wine#Vintage_Infos_.28part_II.29 that has become
Please add your comments/input to the talk page Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_is_not_a_wine_guide.
Thanks! Regards -- Steve.Moulding 20:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
My edits to Talk:Infant formula
[edit]FYI I wasn't replying to your comments, but replying to the original comment from 63.3.16.2 - that's why I used 1 level of indentation instead of 2. You are correct however that the talk page is not the place for my sarcasm, so I've changed the text. Ciotog 05:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project Newsletter
[edit]
 Issue I - February 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Thapsacus
[edit]Biblical/secular means Biblical/all the rest: that is, "bibliocentrism" -if such a word exists!. Furthermore, the Babylonian references are temple documents, so they are neither secular, nor biblical. To make sense with the historical context, it's better to categorize it according to the place where it is found: 1- classical writers, 2- the Biblie, 3- Babylonian documents. We can remove the "alleged" from the title, in fact it'd be better say it in the text itself. About the 1911 quotation, we can add more modern quotes, or merge it in another section.--Amizzoni 02:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- PS: I like the subject, so think in a couple of days I'll look for more bibliography to expand the article. I think that the modern references should be merged into the discussion on the location. The "references" system is useful as a summary, but mekes further discussion more difficult. --Amizzoni 03:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like a division classical/biblical/Babylonian, because it's the usual categorization of primary sources talking about Ancient Near East history. I think that the moden quotations should be marged into the main text, so they could be used for discussion. In a few days I'll expand the "location" section with updated info, so you'll tell me what do you think.--Amizzoni 19:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Wine Project Newsletter
[edit]|
Issue II - March 4th, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter
[edit]|
Issue III - March 18, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter
[edit]|
Issue IV - April 1st, 2007 | |
| |
|
This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. | |
Wine Project Newsletter
[edit]
|
The Wine Project Newsletter! Issue V - April 15, 2007 |
|
| This newsletter is sent to those listed under Participants on the Wine Project page. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter please include Decline newsletter next to your name on the Participant list. If you have any Wikipedia wine related news, announcements or suggestions drop a note in the Comments/Suggestion area of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Newsletter. |
Wine Project activity
[edit]This is a friendly note to let you know that you have been moved to the Inactive members page of the Wine Project. Users are moved to this page when two months have passed without any Wikipedia activity or 3 months have passed without any contribution to a wine related article. The intent of the Participant list is to function as a resource for other editors wishing to get in contact with wine project members for comments or question on Wikipedia's wine article. The goal of this process is to try and maintain the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine/Participants as current and up to date as possible with active and contributing members. Please note that this is not intended to be a negative reflection on your Wikipedia or wine related contribution and it is well known that sometimes outside life can take editors away from Wikipedia for some time. You will always be welcomed to rejoined the Wine Project should you feel that the time is right. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk or on the Wine Project talk page. Best wishes. AgneCheese/Wine 22:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Dpotter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Pair 3 wire 2 horizontal solid.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
