User talk:Dox1donny
I c there're many miss'g info about NC.
Problems with upload of File:GKK logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:GKK logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. on the article Yialousa --Lerdthenerd wiki defender 17:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, --Lerdthenerd wiki defender 18:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 07:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justice Forever for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 07:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 08:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you thought I attacked you, I apologize for the any comprehension that leads you to think in that regard. My intention and action was to take the issue in front of you by the edit actions of the other user. If you disturbed about my usage of your Wiki-page, then be sure that I will not write anything to your page! By the way, I wrote there (for the information of other Wiki-users) in summary:
User:Shirt58 DELETED MY REFERENCED INFO and CALAIMED sockpuppetry for me
[edit]=Proof and possible reasonings of divertions=
[edit]- My edits are claimed to be unconstructive by User:Shirt58!
- Look that User:Shirt58 DELETES ALL THE REFERENCED INFO and emptifies the Page : http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gerolakkos&diff=418263892&oldid=418263618
- What did User:Shirt58 delete?
1: Greek Cypriots sold their properties to the Government of Northern Cyprus
2: ECHR's decision on redirecting ALL Greek Cypriots to the Jurecy of Northern Cyprus (under the remedy of Turkey).
Then, I write why some wiki-users may object the referenced data:
"Sellings of Greek Cypriots properties to the Government of Northern Cyprus" and "ECHR's case-law that ALL Greek Cypriots MUST apply to the Northern Cyprus' Jurecy (as the domestic remedy of Turkey)" may disturb their claim about "de facto"ness of NC.
Please, do not regard the above as attacking. Rather, I explain to the situation who may be infamiliar to the issues discussed. Dox1donny (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Your comments attacked User:Shirt58, not me. You should not make personal comments alluding to misbehaviour of any user. This is against WP:AGF and WP:NPA. Comment on contributions not on contributors. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 08:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- I did not want to attack to User:Shirt58. I got disturbed about the deletion of my referenced information. I do not know how and where I should complain him. Which tags should I use? I found:
- I did not want to attack to User:Shirt58. I got disturbed about the deletion of my referenced information. I do not know how and where I should complain him. Which tags should I use? I found:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism
Types of vandalism
Blanking, illegitimate
Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason, or replacing entire pages with nonsense. Sometimes referenced information or important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. Blanking that could be legitimate includes blanking all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and unbiased information on the living; blanking may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, {{uw-test1}} or {{uw-delete1}}, as appropriate, should be used as initial warnings for content removals without more.
Should I use {{uw-test1}} or {{uw-delete1}}? Where (on which page?) should I put? Is there any tag that denotes "deletion of referenced info without explaining any reason"? I do not want to accuse User:Shirt58 falsely by putting wrong tags!Dox1donny (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
File:GKK logo.jpg missing description details
[edit]is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)