User talk:Doulos Christos

Welcome All!

Hello, Doulos Christos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 15:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, A bit of Help

{{helpme}} There is a vandal that is CONSTANTLY vandalizing our cients page, Shawn "Pettus" Brown. How can we block this vandal from making changes? Could you help protect this page for us for a period of time? Thank you. Kappa96 (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the helpme template is supposed to be placed on your own talk page, not someone else's. Have a good day. - Jameson L. Tai ^{loltalk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 03:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit and revert

{{helpme}} We have been trying to clean up the vandalism on our clients page, Shawn Pettus Brown. The information on the discussion page is not accurate and our client was acquitted of all the false cahrges. Can you please help us. Kappa96 (talk) 05:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh, your problem is that you need to read WP:EDITSUM! Now that I understand the issue, I've removed the post myself. When all of the content of a page disappears with no edit summary, alarm bells go off and people rush to undo that action! That's why it's always best to explain what you are doing in the edit summary, no matter how minor. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 11:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assistance. It truly is appreciated. Kappa96 (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the recent edits,

its a friend messing about on his laptop, why should my ip be effected? Why not computer or something! 92.15.12.39 (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because if you share your connection you will have only a single IP. -- Menti fisto 02:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Single-gender worlds

as can be seen i meant to type this: The Crime and the Glory of Commander Suzdal. Sadly i typed this: the crime and the glory of commander suzdal. This mistake would have took me all of 30 seconds to relieze and correct. However you decided to leave me a message instead. For future reference why dont you spend more time on trying to fix articles then bug editors. A simply internet search would have found my error and you could have corrected it. instead you went with a revert. THIS IS NOT APPRECIATED ONE BIT BY ANYONE EVER!! Let me ask you something: how could you possible know every single sci-fi story ever written!? the answer is: you cant. If you know even the slightest amount of knowledge about this field you wouldnt have reverted my edit. obviously you spent all of 1 second looking at what i did and then reverting it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.228.169.184 (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 06:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Doulos Christos (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bling

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your good work keeping the encyclopedia clean. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 12:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir! (...or ma'am?) Doulos Christos (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A recent edit.

Hi, you made this edit which actually reverted a reversion of vandalism (thus restoring the vandalism). I reverted your edit using Twinkle, but I wanted to let you know that I'm pretty sure you didn't intend to vandalize that page and simply got confused in the chain of reverts (as I have done many times myself). In any event, your edit history shows a strong record of fighting vandalism, so thanks and keep up the good work. --Loonymonkey (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, it's my first time trying out Huggle. I'll take a look over the rest of my contributions to make sure I did okay the rest of the time. Thanks for letting me know. Sorry about that! Doulos Christos • talk 03:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

WikiThanks

Thank you for the quick revert on my guestbook. :) Queenie ^Talk 17:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 19:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Why did you remove my warning here?--Giants27 T C 01:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh, looks like we both tried reverting and warning at the same time and WP:HUGGLE got confused. Sorry! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, was just curious in your reasoning. Thanks!--Giants27 T C 03:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Please stop reverting my edits at Bandit (disambiguation) and tagging me as a vandal. These have all been good faith edits to move the page, as discussed on the discussion page, to have a separate article for the television series. The automated revisions can be incredibly frustrating as we are all working to improve this project.--Stadler981 (talk) 01:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I figured out why that was happening - because you were inappropriately doing a cut-and-paste move. I asked at WP:AN that someone fix the pages that are messed up now and maybe they can explain why what you are doing is incorrect. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 02:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying, though I would be remiss to not point out that for a novice user to be frustrated, confused, labeled as a vandal, and fairly insulted for attempting good faith edits in a way that was the prior standard, is probably not the best for a project hoping to draw help from everyone. Obviously that change was not up to you, but please be understanding and perhaps less immediately condemning and belittling to people who are trying to help.--Stadler981 (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Hanssen

I understand your general suspicion of vandalism in the case of the Hanssen article, however, I question what constitutes the informational value of Hanssen's sexual preferences. Whether or not he shared sex video tapes or had contacts with prostitutes does not represent an informational value. On which ground would you leave this information there, then? A biography should not the place where ALL information about the respective person are gathered - but if so, why not include his eye color and hair color? Simply because the information about particular aspects of a person's life is there, i.e. available, and accessible somewhere (and justifiable through references), does not state anything about the informational value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.100.126.154 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:79.67.141.243

this is a sock of a banned user harassing always the same person. I reported him to AIV for inmediate blocking --Enric Naval (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Howdy! One of the downsides of using templates is that it's often really obvious that you're just using a template. For example, User:75.48.124.175 vandalized the Robert Gates article, and it's very very obvious that he didn't consider 'what the crap' to be a constructive edit, but your templated warning suggests that might have been possible. A thought, consider trading a fancy, feature rich warning that screams 'I am a robot!' for a short, human bit of text. It might connect with the person at the other end of the keyboard better, and might be the little thing that turns someone into a productive editor. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can see your point but, if I were to be more firm, someone would surely appear here saying I was being too firm. My hope is that the templates have been deemed moderate enough to appease everyone. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 15:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we were writing automatic revert bots that didn't involve human judgment, then I would agree with you, but we're doing the work we do here specifically because we _aren't_ bots. If you have to use templates (and while personally, I'm not a big fan, I think they do more harm than help) would it be possible to have more than one so you can use one that's appropriate to the situation? Either way, best regards - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally see what you are saying. I also have an extensive watchlist of commonly-vandalized pages (thousands actually) and am still seeing far too much vandalism escaping the first wave of recent change patrollers. The bots and the bot-like humans are simply not doing a good enough job. Being careful about what I say to someone who says "Tyler is gay" or "this is crap" is going to cause the holes in that first wave to open further. Maybe that's just my perception but it is what it is. If the anti-vandalism bots get better - or if some flagged revisions methodology is properly implemented - maybe I will start to agree with you. Regardless, I hope your vision of quickly reforming blatant vandals can be a reality someday. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 15:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment about other user's removal of deletion tags

Just so you know, if someone else removes a tag from an article and also changed the content of the article, you should manually readd the tag and don't revert the added content as well. Also, if the user blanks a page they created after a speedy tag was added, you should just add

Hello, Doulos Christos. You have new messages at Db-g7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

to it instead of reverting. Just wanted to let you know. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 16:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

whats your problem, i was cleaning up the page. i made the original article in the first place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youchia32 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Azad university IR in oxford

Hiya!

On the article "Azad university IR in oxford"* you reverted the editor who blanked the page back to your deletion request. No big deal, but I thought you'd like to know that if the only author of a page ** blanks it, it's considered a request for deletion anyway. You needn't bother with that in the future. :) Kylu (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* - Which I've since deleted, no point in wikilinking to it.

** - Not including article tagging, stub templates, disambiguation, interwiki templates, article name moves, or other edits which don't directly affect the content of the page.

Love your user page

Its cool! thanks for the informative read :)

JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 04:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee, thanks. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 05:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

decided to start an account

If you know of a scientist who was advocating Theistic evolution before Asa Gray I'd love to know who it was. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitovino (talk • contribs) 05:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the recent vandalism to my talk page! You beat me by about half a second. >:( -down load | sign! 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, sorry! I'm sure you'll get a chance to fix my pages before long. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 02:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Which article are you referring to can you please kindly provide a link?

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^Sandbox 03:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like he has has 1 warning for Oregon Trail and the other warnings from Oregon Country.It seems to me that he is putting random information in throughout the context which makes no sense what so ever however i will review the post.

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^Sandbox 03:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do understand that mistakes happen and also try looking at it from a different point of view as per now i will be removing the warnings from this user.False positives happen every so offten.

Take care

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^Sandbox 03:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For Helping other Wikipedia user's in tight and akward situation's and still being kind to all parties about a situation .Enjoy Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^Sandbox 03:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm learning to be careful with those fancy Huggle buttons too. There's always room for improvement! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 03:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time today i had a false positive X_X oh well.

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 03:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You keep on beating me to the revert! -down load \| sign! 05:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee, thanks! Huggle is a wonderful thing! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 06:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great Job

Seems we warned a user really close together, huh? --♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 02:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC) So you earned this:[reply]

You, {{{1}}}, have just been awarded The New Mikemoral's generic barnstar in miniature. You can earn this award too for other generic things, just like {{{1}}} did.

Drat you. You have beaten me thrice already. So again: --♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 02:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You, {{{1}}}, have just been awarded The New Mikemoral's generic barnstar in miniature. You can earn this award too for other generic things, just like {{{1}}} did.

Heh heh, thanks! Hard to compete with Huggle it seems. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 03:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle? Bleh. I use a combination of Lupin's tool, rollback and Twinkle. --♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 04:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Kalyan

Vandalism by 76.251.241.150 was made 'permanent' by User:Thehelpfulbot, so I've reverted to previous to that. HalfShadow 03:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, thanks. That bot shouldn't be allowed. If it has to add a <references/> tag, it should raise a big red flag about blanking vandalism. Instead, it masks it. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 03:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

S'alright; it caught me, too. Honestly, these 'sign' bots cause more trouble than they supposedly help... HalfShadow 03:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand...

Hello! So, I was just checking out Britney and I saw that it linked to Barack Obama. I tried to revert it but it was reverted already. I was doing some research on this Yasmallhandsomedude guy and I think he did not deserve his editing restrictions.

Hear me out:

   Okay he misused his editing abilities until you gave him his last warning.
   After that he vandalised your pages.
   Is it considered vandalism if somebody vandalises user pages?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fisherman Vs. Ghostface (talk • contribs) 10:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You answered your own question... "if somebody vandalises user pages". Doulos Christos ♥ talk 12:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Kiesling on Dude

Sorry if it was not clear, but this edit was not vandalism. See my comment on the talk page. Cnilep (talk) 16:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, thanks!

Oops, didn't note the recurring vandalism at Apples to Apples. Just wanted to drop a thanks for spotting my error -- too many editors would just bypass the article as done! masqueraid 00:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't mention it! :) I'm sure you've covered things I've overlooked - just today even! Doulos Christos ♥ talk 00:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the attack on my pages. I won't block since the editor doesn't seem to have assaulted any other pages jimfbleak (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 16:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the reverts on my user and talk pages. :) Little Mountain 5 16:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't mention it. I think you fixed mine more than I fixed yours! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 16:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked AfDs

Hi. When you see an IP trying to do this, it is often a sign that he or she is actually requesting that someone do this. Thanks. --Dynaflow babble 20:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a bit presumptuous, but you're prolly right. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 20:45, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the special case of closed AfDs, especially those on (auto)biographical subjects, it should be one's first presumption. For 89.240.199.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), looking back at the first two edits he made today, it is quite clear who is sitting at the other end of that IP address. I just wanted you to be conscious of this possibility if you ever encounter a similar situation in the future. Cheers. --Dynaflow babble 21:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?

[1] :S what? Vítor & Rihanna (msg) 22:43 22 February 2009 (UTC)

See next edit. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 22:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belmont and Gilesgate Moor

I am not vandalising the paged. Half of the information on the Belmont page is incorrect such as the retail park and Soccarena as they are located in Gilesgate. Also, with Gilesgate Moor it is a part of Gilesgate so there is no need for the page as it is a very small area of the village.

Deletion is either thataway or thisaway or this other way. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 02:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thank you.Fouldsythekingisbackagain (talk) 02:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I just wanted to stop in and thank you for catching the edit on my page... Pax85 (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darnit,

you've seem to have edited my post on trigonometry deleting what i wrote. Why? i havent exactly vandalized the page and what i wrote gave a idea of the main article

Because your text was not - and is not - supported by any sources. Worse yet, your first attempt was misplaced - before the link to History of trigonometry. Now that it's in the right place, I'll leave it and see if anyone else objects. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 12:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

In blocking an anon IP68.153.118.194 for vandalism to William Henry Harrison and rolling back to your last good edit, I inadvertently blocked you momentarily. Realizing my mistake at once, I corrected my error and unblocked immediately. Please accept my humble apologies! JGHowes ^talk 21:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?! ZOMG!!!! I'm going straight to WP:RFAR and demanding you be desysopped immediately!!!! .......Not really. No big deal. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 23:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I owe you one.

JGHowes ^talk 23:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh...

{{unblock-auto|1=209.77.178.36|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Doulos Christos". The reason given for Doulos Christos's block is: "Vandalism".|3=JGHowes|4=1329989}}

Looks like the autoblock is still hanging out there. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 18:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1329989 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: —Travis ^talk 18:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thank you! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 19:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stripper clip

Hi, the article Stripper clip exists, and I think the anon is justified in including it at Stripper (disambiguation). It doesn't look like vandalism to me. —An gr 12:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, woops. The original attempt(s) were for Stripper Clip - a red link. Guess I should have checked subsequent edits. Sorry. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 12:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Borg

While I do appreciate your attentions, I can't help but feel you noticed the page was edited by an IP and responded for that. From what I understand, "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". If you had read the discussion page, you would have noticed that it was not in fact an attempt to compromise Wikipedia's integrity, but rather provide a valid redirect.

As a temporary measure, I'll add a disambiguation page instead of the immediate redirect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.54.126 (talk) 13:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Stop reverting my talk page. Thanks. ^_^ 67.55.70.4 (talk) 20:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Doulos Christos. You have new messages at MBK004's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-MBK₀₀₄ 20:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re

I honestly don't know i don't recall warning that user and how kind of him to give me a barnstar :) i dont know look at his history.

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 00:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea's about that i guess he they really care :).

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 00:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found it i reverted one of his vandal post and i guess they are mad.

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 00:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Gibbons

Hi, if you have issues with specific edits to the CGHS page, please revert them individually and include and explanation that address why. If an editor has already explained the revision that you are changing, perhaps you'd want to address them in the Talk page of the article before reverting it. -- Lucas20 (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have issues with most of that article. It's been vandalized out of control. I think I finally found the last good version. The one you chose had the infobox removed, etc. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there have been intermediate edits of value that you are reverting on a wholesale level. Tackle the existing article as is and fix it to keep the history in tact. I'd appreciate not having to redo my edits and reexplain them. -- Lucas20 (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rest of convo left on my Talk page.

You win

If you want the version with the infobox inexplicably removed, you got it. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Duly noted, added the infobox, but kept the 2mos+ worth of edit history in tact. -- Lucas20 (talk) 01:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your "2mos+ worth of edit history". Hardly seems worth the time taken to discuss it IMHO. And not a source to be had. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Lucas20 (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of David Goldman withdraws

David Goldman was set to be a 4 year varsity starter in every year at friends, was school president, and was pretty much the coolest guy around. His withdrawal has hit everyone hard. Please it is indeed an important event and deserves to be on the timeline. Please do not delete the post for misuse again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.183.31 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC) [edit]Your deletion of David Goldman withdraws

I see your point but consider this. Who is most likely to view an article about the Friends School of Baltimore? A person with at least some knowledge of the school. If this person was looking for more information about the school one of the people they would need to know about would be David Goldman. And also consider that it means a lot more to us to have it up there than it means to you to not have it up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.183.31 (talk) 02:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.183.31 (talk)

Userpage warnings being removed by you

I'm guessing this is some sort of WP:HG error ... but I've only noticed it happening from your edits so far (granted, I'm not looking at all other edits, it's just yours that caught my attention so far). It doesn't happen all the time, so I'm not sure what is triggering this ... but the result is that it appears the user has received fewer warnings than they have actually been given.

When applying warnings to user pages, I noticed that your edits sometimes remove other existing warnings while at the same time applying your warning. Here are a handful of examples that I've noticed over the last few days: [2], [3], and [4].

Any idea what's going on here? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that is strange. The only pattern I see is that the removed warnings are for the same page as the one I am warning about. Maybe Huggle has a feature where it combines multiple warnings for the same page? I'll take a look around the feature list. Otherwise, I'd mention these at WP:HG. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You say I am vandalising, but the top of the page says to remove bits that have no source. 203.24.135.66 (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Can you please block the user 209.68.98.21, whose talk page can be seen here, as they have recently vandalised the electronica entry with racist terminology and profanity, which you can see on the article's history section. BTW, I have now removed the offending remark.--Heslopian (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to - but I am not an administrator here and do not have the ability to block. Try WP:AIV or WP:ANI. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 16:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You guys are almost as hysterical with vandalism, as Bush is with terrorism. I can say that I have done best effort to bring articles into serious and scientifically sound shape, until a new fad came up, where every second edit of mine was first reverted as vandalism, because I am anonymous. Then I had to convince some vandal hunter that I really mean it and that I am not one of you school boys with hairy palms. And then I could reinstate the edit. It is really pissing me off. 70.137.184.193 (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to show why Hosur article page is locked

The contents shown at Hosur Discussion page was there when the discussions were going on but one of the admin removed it. I just restored to help people understand what the article about Hosur contains and is purely misleading because of some mad admins at wiki. I here by request you to restore the contents that I posted 59.92.40.234 (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have given edit summery. If you think still its not appropriate, just remove it 59.92.40.234 (talk) 03:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am thoroughly confused. Perhaps you consult someone at WP:ANI. All I see is huge amounts of text being added and removed from that talk page and have no idea why. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 03:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As advised by you, I have posted my request for discussion Hosuronline (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appealed, but http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:X! camein and blocked saying its solved. Please help. I also request you to consider reinstating the user account 'Asprakash'59.92.32.26 (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any updates? 59.92.61.156 (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, there's really nothing I can do. You've gotten yourself in way over my head. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 04:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great Job!!!

You keep beating me to all the vandal reverts! On occasion you even beat ClueBot 0.0! Shawnpoo (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, thanks! It's not me anyway, it's WP:HUGGLE! It's a great little toy. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 19:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just downloaded it =p Gonna try it out Shawnpoo (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thanks for looking out for me. Going on edit patrol really does seem to bring out the crazies, doesn't it? Matt (talk) 01:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, my pleasure! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I see you've already gotten a few of these, but here's another one anyway -- because you're always beating me to the punch on reverting vandalism on Huggle! Matt (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, thanks! You're too kind! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 21:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kompl5x muss eben Kaggen!

Greetings! Thank you for helping revert some of the edits made by Kompl5x muss eben Kaggen! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I've also blocked 3ompl5x stinkt wie Jauche! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for making the same type edits. Is this an editing pattern you've seen before? Right now, I've tagged Kompl5x... as the sockpuppeteer, but I've got a hunch that's not the first account this particular user has used. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can't say I've ever seen that before. Vandals come in all shapes and languages I suppose. :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 15:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mary E. Bryant Elementary

Mea culpa. While trying to revert several instances of rapid-fire unhelpful edits, both the bot and I seem to have kept some material in that definitely needed to be removed. Many thanks for your fast thinking and excellent editing, and I'm sorry for giving you some extra grunt work to do. --Ericdn (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's perfectly alright! I'm sure I do the same on numerous occasions. Sometimes the goofiness comes faster than we can keep up... :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 16:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I completely agree. In this case, the editor was making unproductive changes faster than I could keep up with them. To be honest, I was using the bot's most recent edit as my "go back to" point, but I failed to notice that the bot's edit also contained some material that should have been removed. If this were a long article, I might be able to get away with saying "I just missed it", but, in this case, the article is so short, and I should have noticed it. Once again, thanks for helping out! --Ericdn (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

War on Vandalism

This user, Doulos Christos, is hereby recognized by User:Dromioofephesus as an Ally in his War on Vandalism. (Ally list)

If you join me, we can restore order to the galaxy. —Dromioofephesus (talk) 17:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! S B H arris 23:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Have been given a final warning?

Hello, i have been given a warning from you about vandalism, i have only been editing wikipedia since August 2010 and this is from February 2009, there where previous people on my network before i used it so it wasnt me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.249.129 (talk) 22:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]