User talk:Douglas86

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885885 on 2016-10-23T07:18:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to The Love Guru. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Elizabeth (film) was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875413 on 2016-10-23T19:18:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:4057:B87:4A96:758B (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Toy Soldiers (The Animal In Me song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toy Soldiers (The Animal In Me song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Wreck-It Ralph Two

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Wreck-It Ralph Two. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Wreck-It Ralph 2. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Wreck-It Ralph 2 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wgolf (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (film) was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889835 on 2016-11-01T17:53:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asa Butterfield has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asa Butterfield was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874853 on 2016-11-06T18:29:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dead Memories has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dead Memories was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857253 on 2016-11-12T16:19:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amélie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amélie was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866573 on 2016-11-17T17:37:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wildest Dreams (Taylor Swift song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wildest Dreams (Taylor Swift song) was changed by Douglas86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867083 on 2016-11-22T19:41:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Kellymoat (talk) 01:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (film). CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 21:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ★Trekker (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Kellymoat (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adam9007. Your recent edit to the page Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 20:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I'm with Cupid. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm TheCoffeeAddict. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thunderbirds (2004 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 12:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Taylor All-Stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bridge to Terabithia (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guess with Jess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beanie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Motörhead. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 17:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Robots (2005 film). Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 17:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Sarcastrophe. Rob van vee 07:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scary Movie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Watchmen (film), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 15:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend this be the last non-indef block you get on this subject - you've been clearly told above what the issue is, and given clear and simple instruction on how to go about this the correct way. Is there something you don't understand? If so, please feel free to ask for help - we'll gladly help you! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 15:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Nut Job. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Was the note unclear? DonIago (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Inception. DonIago (talk) 20:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gordon Ramsay have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 11:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nim's Island. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Snatch (film). The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 15:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 183.171.182.178 (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Douglas86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Primus (band). Rob van vee 06:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psycho (Muse song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Pulp Fiction, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Being John Malkovich, you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 15:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pan's Labyrinth. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 20:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Douglas86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Douglas86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Korn. Rob van vee 15:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]