User talk:DoubleY

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoubleY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IP address that I used to log into Wikipedia was also blocked despite the fact that I edited literally several words since the account was created DoubleY (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, that's how it works when you are blocked. As an aside, using the unblock template to communicate is unnecessary, you can just reply to comments below, and we'll see it. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

DoubleY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "DoubleY". The reason given for DoubleY's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: Ymblanter (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Autoblock appears to be working as intended SQL ^{Query me!} 04:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoubleY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In response to previous reply by Huon: thank you for letting me know. I initially assumed that primary sources are more valuable than secondary and tertiary until I read WP:PRIMARY. Again: I have recently joined Wikipedia and started contributing to articles relating to Ukraine. I edited syntactically incorrect text into simple readable English, rectified repeating or duplicate texts to remove redundancies, removed one reference to a nonexistent website and contributed to articles using information from primary sources as opposed to third party references. I was subsequently blocked by a Russian administrator without clear explanation why or any evidence of wrongdoing. DoubleY (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

see below
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technically indistinguishable
InstantExample (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) to DoubleY
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, am I reading the above correctly - you either tried to log out and continue editing, or you tried to use another account? SQL ^{Query me!} 04:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoubleY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have recently joined Wikipedia and started contributing to articles relating to Ukraine. I edited syntactically incorrect text into simple readable English, rectified repeating or duplicate texts to remove redundancies, removed one reference to a nonexistent website and contributed to articles using information from primary sources as opposed to third party references. I was subsequently blocked by a Russian administrator without clear explanation why or any evidence of wrongdoing.DoubleY (talk) 23:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were clearly POV-pushing. See WP:PRIMARY on why using primary sources over third-party references is inappropriate, but edits like this are pure propaganda. Huon (talk) 23:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recent edit to Andriy Biletsky (politician)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Andriy Biletsky (politician) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted two of your other edits as well and was considering blocking you per WP:NOTTHERE. If you continue, this is certainly going to happen.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page War in Donbass has been reverted.
Your edit here to War in Donbass was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://oyblogg.blogspot.ca/?m=1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]