User talk:DotHectate
Welcome!
Hello, DotHectate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stencyl, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Improving Stencyl article
[edit]I'd strongly suggest you add more inline references from non-primary sources; i.e. instead of using stencyl own press releases and website, use the much more reliable articles you've in external links, like from BBC or Wired. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Stencyl and COI
[edit]Just a friendly note that you may want to check out our policy on conflicts of interest. This would apply not only to articles like Stencyl, but also when linking to the article in question. Edits like this and this border on advertising, which is not what we're about. I'll be reverting some of the more blatant advertisements, but I wanted to let you know why I'm doing so. I hope this helps! Cheers! Wyatt Riot (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I understand your concern - it wasn't my intention to advertise, just to get the article further linked, but perhaps I got carried away. My apologies. DotHectate (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens. You wouldn't believe how many times people try to add things like "research shows blah blah blah, but now with our NEW PRODUCT...". Once the article takes off, people will start to link to it, especially once Stencyl gets mentioned in better sources. It just happens naturally. Not to say that you can't do the linking yourself, it's just discouraged because of the difficulties in remaining neutral. If/when Stencyl becomes fairly high-profile according to quality sources, I'll gladly self-revert and add some links myself. Cheers! Wyatt Riot (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I'll go check out the wikiprojects to see if there's something I can help with not related to this. DotHectate (talk) 02:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, it happens. You wouldn't believe how many times people try to add things like "research shows blah blah blah, but now with our NEW PRODUCT...". Once the article takes off, people will start to link to it, especially once Stencyl gets mentioned in better sources. It just happens naturally. Not to say that you can't do the linking yourself, it's just discouraged because of the difficulties in remaining neutral. If/when Stencyl becomes fairly high-profile according to quality sources, I'll gladly self-revert and add some links myself. Cheers! Wyatt Riot (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I understand your concern - it wasn't my intention to advertise, just to get the article further linked, but perhaps I got carried away. My apologies. DotHectate (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Great job with the Stencyl article. Its very well written and structured. Wonderfl (reply) 14:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC) |