User talk:DorothyCrittenden

Welcome!

Hello, DorothyCrittenden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Seventeen Seconds did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Rob van vee 07:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have to fix things if the so called professional editors would do shit correctly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DorothyCrittenden (talk • contribs)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ResPM (T🔈 🎵C) 00:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I reject this indefinite (permanent) ban because I feel it has little to do with getting me to conform to Wikipedia's standards and is more so a vindictive reaction to me scolding one of your own (professional editors). }}

. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I would have given a timed block for genre warring, however your reply to Magnolia677 above gives a fairly clear indication that you're not ignorant of our sourcing requirements, you just have no intention of following them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]