User talk:Donor

Fair use rationale for Image:The Third Antichrist front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Third Antichrist front.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Nocturnal Silence cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Nocturnal Silence cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Fight Fire with Fire. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —B o L 05:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for adding copyrighted material on Fight Fire with Fire. If you continue to do that, you will be blocked from editing. As I mentioned above, for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text, even lyrics. Thank you. —B o L 05:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Slow Asphyxiation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in FIFA 100

Hi, I see that you removed the asterisks from a bunch of retired players listed in FIFA 100. It seems you misunderstood what the symbol means - it means that the player was active at the time of the announcement of FIFA 100, not active currently (that's what the italics are for). Since the player's status at the time of the announcement will never change, you shouldn't remove the asterisk from any player. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 04:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tales from the Underworld

The article Tales from the Underworld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no claim of notability. Mostly non-notable bands.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 16:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tales from the Underworld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tales from the Underworld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales from the Underworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 21:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]