User talk:Donnie Park/Archives/2016/January
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Donnie Park. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, Donnie Park!
Donnie Park,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America1000 03:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cliff Lett (January 2)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cliff Lett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Donnie Park,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RadioFan (talk) 03:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Happy New Year, Donnie Park!
Donnie Park,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2016)
King Mswati III, the monarch of Swaziland, one of the Monarchies in Africa.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Person of the Year • Hors d'oeuvre Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 04:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Rosche has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2016)
Depictions of various deities on the entrance tower of Sri Mariamman Temple, Singapore, dedicated to the Hindu goddess of rain; Mariamman.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Monarchies in Africa • Person of the Year Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cliff Lett has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2016)
New England clam chowder
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Deity • Monarchies in Africa Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
RC10 PAGE
Hi Donnie Park, I see that you are working on an RC10 page in you userspace that was taken down from the main space. I am very interested in getting all of the important historical RC Car facts up here on Wikipedia. Please let me know in my Talk Section if there is anything I can do to help in getting this page ready for the main section.DroneKing (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2016)
Hello, Donnie Park.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Chowder • Deity Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Automobile Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bertone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Nic Case
Hi Donnie Park, I've accepted your AfC submission Nic Case. After reviewing the sources, I found that he did have significant coverage in mainstream media and passes WP:GNG. Thanks for your submission! -Zanhe (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Considering retirement?
Ahhh come on. Ya' gotta stick around, Donnie Park. GoodDay (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will do. Donnie Park (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your determination and dedication to help the encyclopedia grow. Thank you for you great contributions to automobile and motorsport articles and to the Encyclopedia in general! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
Editor Yash! submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
User Donnie Park started editing Wikipedia in June of 2008 and has dedicated a great amount of time working in the mainspace. His edits mostly revolve around automobile and motorsport articles with over 62% of them to mainspace. He has created 66 articles, has 22 DYK credits, and has been actively updating and maintaining many various and interesting articles, the type of work which mostly goes unnoticed and unappreciated. He has been actively editing this site for over seven and a half years and his hard work at greatly improving articles for our readers is nothing short of amazing. Long-standing, tireless, consistent and a true example of a consistently efficient content editor. For all his awesome contributions, this is to let him know that his work is noticed and highly appreciated by all. The Wikipedia community proudly acknowledges that Donnie Park is a great editor and we are very thankful for his edits. If anyone deserves to be named Editor of the Week, it is this editor.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk 06:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia can be very frustrating at times and I totally get why you must be feeling discouraged. I hope that you decide against retiring cause we need editors like you and it would be such a shame to see a dedicated person like you leave because someone acted like a jerk. Again, thank you for your edits and congratulations on the award :) Yash! 13:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yash! Thanks a lot. but one more thing to interest you with in regards to him. Donnie Park (talk) 13:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is your Wiki-Journey really over? Are you going to let the naysayers win? What if your Wiki-experience had taken a slightly different course? Maybe what you need is a new direction, a new sandbox to play in (so to speak), a new set of priorities. I can't prove it but I KNOW that if a person merely changes their mind, they change their experience. Most editors start with high hopes, high purpose, high regards for others. Each Wiki-life is different but for some, sadly, the roads traveled have led to the same place; they suffer some negative involvement and they become discontented and disheartened. Wikipedia's design flaw is the same as any open free society. It can not always control the actions of its citizens/members. There exist trolls, loud mouthed oafs, over-zealous "trigger happy" editors and administrators, editors whose only wish is cause discomfort and strife: all are enemies of Wiki-Wonderful, all have a negative effect on "the neighborhood". Editor Retention pays attention to the "Lost Souls" that become discouraged and "move out of the neighborhood". The analogy to a neighborhood is accurate. If we are not vigilant, quality editors like yourself leave the site and their efforts are lost. The time spent focused on your nemesis is wasted time, for the most part. It is better to move forward. The value of an editor that gives up and leaves cannot be measured. Remember what made you happy. Do that and the negative interactions will disappear. Buster Seven Talk 13:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- I like to think not yet but thanks for the advice. Donnie Park (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is your Wiki-Journey really over? Are you going to let the naysayers win? What if your Wiki-experience had taken a slightly different course? Maybe what you need is a new direction, a new sandbox to play in (so to speak), a new set of priorities. I can't prove it but I KNOW that if a person merely changes their mind, they change their experience. Most editors start with high hopes, high purpose, high regards for others. Each Wiki-life is different but for some, sadly, the roads traveled have led to the same place; they suffer some negative involvement and they become discontented and disheartened. Wikipedia's design flaw is the same as any open free society. It can not always control the actions of its citizens/members. There exist trolls, loud mouthed oafs, over-zealous "trigger happy" editors and administrators, editors whose only wish is cause discomfort and strife: all are enemies of Wiki-Wonderful, all have a negative effect on "the neighborhood". Editor Retention pays attention to the "Lost Souls" that become discouraged and "move out of the neighborhood". The analogy to a neighborhood is accurate. If we are not vigilant, quality editors like yourself leave the site and their efforts are lost. The time spent focused on your nemesis is wasted time, for the most part. It is better to move forward. The value of an editor that gives up and leaves cannot be measured. Remember what made you happy. Do that and the negative interactions will disappear. Buster Seven Talk 13:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)