User talk:DonnaJRick

Welcome!

Hi DonnaJRick! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Hey there, I noticed you are a relatively new editor and that you moved the article Ivan Mbakop out from draftspace. Typically, these articles should be reviewed through the WP:Articles for creation process rather than being unilaterally moved by a new and potentially less experienced editor as yourself. This subject was previously determined to not be notable and was moved out from the mainspace once before, although your recent editing to it does not seem to address those concerns. As such, I have nominated it for WP:Speedy deletion in accordance with WP:A7, because none of those roles were major (the actor is not even mentioned at the Reminiscence article and is not clearly notable from roles in Red Notice or Hawkeye. Please take time to review how AfC works and to renew the WP:BLP policy, as well, especially if you are going to continue editing about living persons as it can be quite strict. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aron Walsh has been accepted

Aron Walsh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Jackson (soccer) (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Jackson (soccer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DonnaJRick! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abuta colombiana has been accepted

Abuta colombiana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard T. Brady (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard T. Brady and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speciality to Specialty

Hi, I noticed you've changed Speciality to Specialty a fair amount, Speciality is British-english, which is acceptable on English Wikipedia. Many articles will use British english, it is often what is taught to foreign speakers of English. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 02:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the articles were on subjects relating to the UK, British commonwealth, or Europe, and so were using British english in the article. Of those I have made reversions. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be careful in sustaining the language styles in my spelling correction edits. Thanks for notifying me and correcting them within hours. DonnaJRick (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 08:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me this distinction. I'll be taking care of that in my next edits for sure. DonnaJRick (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was among those mildly annoyed by the speciality > specialty thing ... I therefore feel it's only fair to say how impressed I am with your spelling corrections since then! All that "accidentally" and "across" and the rest! Well done, cheers, DBaK (talk) 09:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! That's what I go through when I read text and find spelling errors and typos - "Annoyance" Haha. Anyways, thanks for the appreciation. DonnaJRick (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babita Wadhwani (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Babita Wadhwani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babiiha Jane Alisemera has been accepted

Babiiha Jane Alisemera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Wynne (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Wynne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicole McLaughlin has been accepted

Nicole McLaughlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard T. Brady (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard T. Brady and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

I'm a bit confused as to how/why you submitted Nicole McLaughlin, but I'm glad it's not getting stuck in my eternal draft chamber. Cheers. Ornov Ganguly TALK 22:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While fixing typos and spellings, i randomly pick articles in draft spaces, clean them up, fix them and submit them hoping to get approved and accepted. Cheers for the cheeseburger 🍔 haha. DonnaJRick (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rpgea per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/B-Factor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a confusion or misunderstanding as my account has been linked with someone else's sockpuppet (RPgeae). I am also not aware of the 'proxy IP' issue as it has been suggested as a reason of blockage. Kindly unblock as its my only account which I use to correct spelling mistakes and typos in articles and occasionally submitting drafts. Kindly guide further as I have been a good amount of contribution to Wikipedia and have been appreciated many times by other editors for my contributions. DonnaJRick (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy I have an extension (Browsec) in my browser integrated in Chrome which might have created some issues which you are referring to as proxy IP. However, the sockpuppet allegation is baseless. I request you to unblock my account so that I can do further spellcheck edits. DonnaJRick (talk) 23:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The information required is in the block notice above. Have a read of the guide to appealing blocks, then use the template shown to request an appeal. Danners430 (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Tonin (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To meet the inclusion criteria, multiple references via reliable, independent sources that provide extensive coverage specifically about Sarah Tonin are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Tonin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 18:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]