User talk:Dongbeom
May 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cloud 9 (2014 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cloud 9 (2014 film) was changed by Dongbeom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937036 on 2014-05-07T21:58:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |
Dongbeom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to create a clean start account. If you decline my request, I will keep on socking. I will stop if you unrevert my edits and unblock me. Dongbeom (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"I'll sock if you don't unblock me!" is not an argument that is going to get you unblocked, especially when you were blocked...for socking. Editors who are not in good standing (you're not) are not allowed to make a WP:CLEANSTART; if you want to be unblocked you're going to have to take the WP:STANDARDOFFER. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dongbeom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am explaining why my block should be lifted. I have read all the policies. I have proposed some good edits. I will not sock puppet again now having the consequences. Monitor my talk page for some edit proposals. You are missing the importance of my edits. I removed unsourced trivia from articles. The program list could have been put in the main article. I realized that blocks are to prevent disruption, not to punish. I will assume good faith to the community, assuming that the community is doing the same. I am sorry for sock puppetry. I have read the welcome page to see what good edits I can make. My new reason to be on Wikipedia is to participate in community discussion, copyedit, revert and report vandals, and clean up bad articles. I promise not to sock puppet again. In fact, I will participate in the SPI discussions. After all, many of the best editors have made mistakes before. Dongbeom (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Seeing as how you copied the exact same rationale from User talk:DanielZayn, consider this declined for the exact same reason. --Kinu t/c 21:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.