User talk:Don'tfallout

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Amos Han 23:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation templates

Hi, I see you're working on the R.B. Pearson article, and that you're having some problems citing the books he has written.

Please consider using a template for citating books: read Template:Cite book. And have a look at WP:FOOT, to learn how to use footnotes.

Regards, Ivansanchez 17:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Nancy Appleton

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nancy Appleton, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nancy Appleton is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nancy Appleton, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 19:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please review Wikipedia's reliable sources criteria before adding further references to Louis Pasteur. -- MarcoTolo 20:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please refrain from adding self-published sources to Wikipedia articles - such sources do not meet the encyclopedia's reliable sources guidelines. If you have questions regarding these guidelines, please leave me a message on this page and I'll be happy to discuss the issue with you. -- MarcoTolo 21:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Appleton article

I've posted a reply to your question on the Nancy Appleton talk page. -- MarcoTolo 20:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Reposting here since the article was deleted)

In order for articles to remain on Wikipedia, they must meet a number of guidelines. For articles about individuals, notability is a significant requirement - more information can be found in the Criteria for notability of people article. More generally, you may also want to read the Your first article page for new editors. -- MarcoTolo 20:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- MarcoTolo 21:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Lomacang

A tag has been placed on John Lomacang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. → AA ^(talk) — 10:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ashwood University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you feel that I've misunderstood your edit then please feel free to say so on my talk page. Thank you, TallMagic (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of R. B. Pearson

The article R. B. Pearson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found to indicate this author meets the notability requirements of WP:NAUTHOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]