User talk:Dokzap

Dispute resolution of Gilgamesh and Heroes in Hell

Your comments on the talk page of Gilgamesh might be helpful in the current dispute resolution for this story. You can find the dispute resolution page here. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 06:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - The Harmonia sock puppet issue on the noticeboard seems to have gone away or been deeply archived. In the event that I will be severely punished for not replying, based on the allegations made, I can say this: 1) Before this notification, I had no knowledge of the Harmonia account, 2) having no knowledge of the Harmonia account, it would be difficult for me to be a sockpuppet for said account, 3) as a writer in the science fiction field since 1981, I am familiar with and know many writers and editors in that field, including Janet Morris; 4) I am familiar with and have written fiction for many editors in the field, including Janet Morris, but I also know Ed Ferman, the late Brian Thomsen, Janet Berliner, Kris Rusch, Dean Wesley Smith, Gardner Dozois, Dana Stabenow, Constance Ash, and a bunch more I can't recall off the top of my head; 5) I also know Robert Silverberg, 6) I also know, well, hundreds of other writers; 7) in the context of the Gilgamesh in the Outback "Who's on first?" discussion, I was not acting as an agent for anyone other than myself and The Truth As It Can Be Known; 8) My main purpose in engaging in the discussion was to suggest a reasonable compromise solution which would accurately state the facts and avoid controversy, 9) based on comments received from neutral parties favorable to this reasonable compromise, I believe it was a reasonable compromise, 10) if this counts as sockpuppetry, a loosely defined concept which I cannot find a specific definition for, then we are all sockpuppets on this bus, and 11) it would seem the penalty for making reasonable compromise solutions seems to be harrassment, which in the long run will drive reasonable people away from an otherwise admirable enterprise, which is too bad. I think that's it.Dokzap (talk) 01:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Dokzap[reply]

First published

So, when do you think it was first published? When do you think that a fan could first purchase and read this story? If you are not sure, say do. If you are certain, say so and provide a reliable, independent source that says so. If the matter is ambiguous, then admit that. If you aren't prepared to say one way or another, then please step aside. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus of the Heroes in Hell Merge - Did it include all of the Books and Stories?

According to my memory during the Lawyers in Hell AfD discussion about merging the Heroes in Hell articles into one large article, it was decided ALL the articles were to be merged. No mention was made of leaving any of the articles separate.

When I went to merge the one remaining article, one editor got really upset saying that the merge discussion did not include this article, Gilgamesh in the Outback. I believe that the consensus was for all articles. The admin who is currently handling the dispute was not involved at the time, and needs to see a show of hands. If you have any opinion on the issue could you please make your opinion known at Talk:Gilgamesh in the Outback. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 15:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]