User talk:Doinkmeister
Welcome!
[edit]
|
August 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Extra Credits episodes has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of Extra Credits episodes was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSxaojFNAsU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Miraclepine. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mac Tonight have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ミラP 00:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]April 2022
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ciaphas Cain, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.92.102.142 (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Notification: Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|your reason here}}
below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) January 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Late Show with Stephen Colbert—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think a indefinite block is too extreme for just one vandalism edit. Maybe a day block? Waylon111 (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- While there have been some other vandalistic edits in the past, there have also been apparently productive ones. Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Doinkmeister (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I accdidently hit "Publish changes" in a fit of drunkeness. I am sorry. Doinkmeister (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is on the examples of bad unblock requests list. You are responsible for whatever edits come from your account whether you are drunk or not. I was kinda sympathetic here as an indef block might be a tad excessive as you have productive edits, but if you are unable to control your editing when you are drunk, then Wikipedia needs to be protected from you. To be unblocked you will need to assure us you will be more responsible with the activities from your account. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.