User talk:Doaneyip

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doane & Company (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doane & Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Doaneyip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello Doaneyip. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Doane & Company, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Doaneyip. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Doaneyip|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I own the company, and I did not pay anyone to write the article. This means you are making mistakes, and this article is 100% original. Doaneyip (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Are you trying to say that you have no financial stake in this subject? I would have thought that as an owner, you inherently do.

Please just make the paid-editing disclosure. This is a hard requirement, not an optional extra. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

how to do it ? Doaneyip (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

{{paid|user=Doaneyip|employer=Doane & Company|client=Doane & Company}} Doaneyip (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Doane & Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Doane & Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
• Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Doaneyip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Doane and Company (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

To create an article for my company (Doane & Company) to record the millstone of my company. Doaneyip (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Doaneyip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Doane and Company (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

To create an article for my company (Doane & Company) to record the millstone of my company. And I will not receive any compensation for these contributions, as it does not make sense because I am not a 3rd party Doaneyip (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This choice of new username is worse, please read the username policy. Accounts are for individuals only, not groups or businesses. Your real name is not required. Regarding the block itself, as the business owner I presume that you operate your business to earn a living, and not as volunteer work for free. That makes you a paid editor, you do not need to be specifically paid to edit(otherwise every paid editor would deny being specifically paid to edit), so you must make the Terms of Use-required paid editing disclosure. Please read WP:PROMO and WP:COI as well. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your business. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to be a more general contributor and edit about other topics unrelated to your business, like your Prime Minister or King Charles or the history of the UK or science, please tell what topics you might edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)