User talk:DoNotGod
May 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Le Sage's theory of gravitation because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 07:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
Sock puppetry
[edit]Regarding your edits ([1], [2], [3]) at Le Sage's theory of gravitation as 192.155.217.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), please be aware of Wikipedia's policy regarding wp:Sock puppetry: "Do not log out just to vandalize as an IP address editor." - DVdm (talk) 09:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Are you making some kind of accusation here? if so, how about I sue you for malicious defamation. I have made no edits outside this account. DoNotGod (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- A strong suspicion, based on the so-called duck-test—see wp:DUCK. About sueing, see wp:NLT. - DVdm (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Are you making some kind of accusation here? if so, how about I sue you for malicious defamation. I have made no edits outside this account. DoNotGod (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
ANI Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit]Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Monty845 01:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
DoNotGod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your editor made a slanderous accusation on this page... you have no right to protect slander, and if your editors make any other remarks wile you have disabled my right to reply I will sue YOU as is my legal AMERICAN right!!!! DoNotGod (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are more than welcome to pursue whatever legal means you feel is necessary. However, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia until the legal matters are resolved. Mike V • Talk 02:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.