User talk:Dltcentennial
|
May 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Miguel A. De La Torre has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:20, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Miguel A. De La Torre has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alxeedo TALK 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Miguel A. De La Torre. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 20:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Miguel A. De La Torre. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Alxeedo TALK 20:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Potential conflict of interest
[edit]Based on the articles that you have edited, I am making a guess that the "dlt" in your username may mean that you have some sort of relationship with Miguel A. De La Torre. If that is the case, you should be aware of our conflict of interest policy. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Miguel A. De La Torre, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.
Edit war warning
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miguel A. De La Torre. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Final notice of Edit Warring - continue and you will be blocked
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miguel A. De La Torre. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)