Jump to content

User talk:Dlodge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dlodge's profile.
Quickly create a new comment with this form.
Archive

Archives

No archives yet

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dlodge

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some handy tips:

  • You can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~
  • Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date.
  • If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 03:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to CLINMED et al.

[edit]

I've noticed that you've been editing medicine related articles -- from your contributions. We have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join or just browse the talk page, which is also known as the doctors' mess.

Seeing that you're in cardiac surgery-- if you have some time, the CABG article could use some expert eyes. :) If you're looking for info on how to do references see WP:CLINMED/Writing_medical_articles.

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have. Other helpful people (and actual doctors) are Samir (who also happens to be in T.O. like yourself), QRS (a retired cardiac surgeon -- that's around occasionally) and Jfdwolff. I look forward to more of your edits. Nephron  T|C 03:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Daniel!
I noticed you've added yourself to the participants list, so I wanted to give you a warm welcome. Surgery is generally covered very poorly here on Wikipedia, so I hope you can change that a little with your edits. If you're interested, I've been working with User:Ksheka to improve myocardial infarction; since he's an interventional cardiologist, maybe a surgeon's view can provide some counterweight . If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or anyone else on WP:CLINMED / the doctor's mess (I can assure you they're the friendliest group of Wikipedians on the planet ).
Enjoy Wikipedia,
grtz, Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pumphead

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome and the links; the link on editing medical articles is quite helpful. I've noticed how poorly some of the surgery articles are written; there are a few I plan to update as I find time. Right now the #1 is pumphead - the plagiarized text from the National Enquirer prompted me to start editing the wikipedia pages. Dlodge 20:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read through the pumphead article. Funny and interesting at the same time. I bet the editors of the NEJM are now kicking themselves for publishing Newman's study... with the National Enquirer's use of the article for entertainment purposes. Nephron  T|C 22:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's isn't like the NEJM to publish such a study without a control group. However CABG has been the most studied procedure in the history of surgery, and Newman's study made Type II neurocognitive deficits a hot topic in cardiovascular research. (maybe I should define type I & II neurological injury somewhere). Awareness of the issue has been much of the driving force behind the recent innovations in OPCAB. Unfortunately, the whole "pumphead" issue has been used extensively by physcians and corporations promoting stenting as superior to cardiac surgery. A PCI vs. CABG would be a good wiki page, undoubtedly subject to lots of editing and likely a NPOV tag a few times.
I have started a CABG vs. PCI page in my sandbox. Dlodge 01:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Hello Daniel & thanks for the suggestion on my talk page. Although I have 3 layers of spam protection I've elected to take your advice & delete my email address from my home page. When I initially registered I ticked the box "Enable e-mail from other users", but haven't yet worked out how to use templates to tag the home page.
May I compliment you on your initiative in gaining both B.Eng & MD degrees which will be of great benefit in furthering the application of computer science to the science & art of surgery. As a personal observation, there needs to be better dialogue between those in clinical practice with those who design instruments, for all from nurse upwards, in order to restrict the ever increasing complexity of operation which allows 'the hand of Murphy' to be of potential danger.
Happy to correspond. Geoff Geoffrey Wickham 02:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly for the compliment on my combined degree. I took the liberty of restoring the email text on your homepage, but replacing the Wikipedia email link instead of your actual address. Dlodge 06:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Glasair Aviation

[edit]

The articles are looking good, and I am interested. I'll see what I can add over the next few days; while I used to go to the Arlington Fly-In yearly and hang out at the S-H factory, things have changed over the years and they're no longer as public-friendly as they once were. I wasn't aware that New Glasair and New GlaStar had merged, for example. Anyway, I'll add what I can, and scrounge around for photos of Glasairs and GlaStars. ericg ✈ 23:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't have much of a background in airplanes, so any help is appreciated. I'm not certain the companies have merged, but both the Glasair and Glastar are now sold by Glasair Aviation, LLC. Dlodge 23:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surgical staples

[edit]

Thanks for creating the article; I fixed a typo (the kind I seem to skilled in making), & added some info I stumbled across in my searches the other night. Now I just need to play model. -- llywrch 23:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: removed link from warfarin page

[edit]

Hi Daniel - I just want to let you know that the link to warfarin-related postings on ClotCare is not a spam link. The site has a wealth of resources for patients and healthcare professionals relating to warfarin. ClotCare is a free resource, does not sell anything, subscribes to the HONCode, and all information is presented by leading anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy experts from the US and Canada. The author of each posting is clearly identified, and you can review the credentials of each editorial board member at http://www.clotcare.com/clotcare/eb.aspx. If you have any questions you can contact me directly at mariewalker@clotcare.com.

Further discussion at Talk:Warfarin#Clotcare. Dlodge 21:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of E. Converse Peirce 2nd/Publications

[edit]

I've nominated E. Converse Peirce 2nd/Publications, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that E. Converse Peirce 2nd/Publications satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Converse Peirce 2nd/Publications and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of E. Converse Peirce 2nd/Publications during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Resurgent insurgent 11:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments and discussion at the AfD page. Dlodge 17:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm on cardiac surgery at the moment...

[edit]

If you have a sec you can double check/perhaps enhance my description[1] of the angiogram (image) in angiogram and angioplasty. Nephron  T|C 03:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CPSO

[edit]

Hi, If you could, add the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) to your watchlist. It seems to attract a lot of POV-driven commentary. I've been there a couple of times to clean-up... it could use another set of eyes watching. Nephron  T|C 19:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of the minimaze page, etc.

[edit]

Dr. Lodge, would you have time to revert some of your edits on the minimaze page? It's now entitled Maze procedure (which I think we agreed needs its own page), and begins with "The maze procedure is a collection of cardiac surgery procedures...", which is not gramatically correct. The part about the Maze is intended only to give background regarding development of the various minimaze procedures. To highlight this, perhaps the heading that now reads "The Cox maze procedure" should read "Origins of the minimaze procedures: The Cox Maze" or similar. Thanks. jamesmcclelland 21:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompting, I've been quite busy lately and haven't been doing much Wikipedia editing lately. I met Jim Cox a few weeks ago and I've been meaning to fix the Maze pages. Dan. Dlodge 00:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Lodge, there are now separate pages for the minimaze procedures and for the Cox maze procedure. Everything was moved correctly so previous history is intact. The Cox maze page is mostly a "stub" but feel free to buff it up when you have time! jamesmcclelland (talk) 23:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MCOTW

[edit]
 Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.
This week Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was selected.
Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 11:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

Nice work on setting up Template:Vascular surgery procedures - that was an elegant solution. --Arcadian 18:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2009

[edit]
Toronto Candidate City for Wikimania 2009
Support TORONTO in its bid to become the host city of WIKIMANIA 2009
Visit m:Wikimania 2009/Toronto for TORONTO's MetaWiki page and help build a strong bid.

-- Zanimum 15:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

I saw you milling about in the cardiac ICU last weekend-- if I hadn't been busy with a consult I'd have said hello. Nephron  T|C 20:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Remembrance...

[edit]
Rememberance Day


--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

drug eluting stent towards consensus

[edit]

have a look at the DES page where I hope we're coming to a consensus Donsmokem (talk) 02:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

template:interventional cardiology

[edit]

you seem to be knowledgeable about making and deploying templates. I have started a Template:Interventional Cardiology and would be glad for tips how to get it incorporated into the superstructure. Also invite you to build consensus at the drug-eluting stent discussion page. Can the advert and cleanup tags go? I think so. thx Donsmokem (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your help, I didn't know where to submit the page and thank goodness for my ignorance; you're right, I need to poll for its usefulness. Take care, Koko —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koko larue (talk • contribs) 22:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

[edit]

Cardiology task force

[edit]
Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

Maen. K. A. (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
 Thank you for joining Cardiology task force, a collaborative effort to make the project more comprehensive and allot of improvment needed for many articles. Below are some ongoing tasks for you to take part in, or you can add a task to do. Another great place to check out is Category:Cardiovascular system stubs. Happy editing, T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

request for communication re graft sequelae

[edit]

What happens as when venous grafts deteriorate? Do they do so slowly or fail quickly at the end? This should be an important detail as to whether or not “revascularization” should be examined after 10 or 15 years. I imagine that the vascular architecture (anastomoses, calibers, etc.) would be able to adjust to some extent if the process is slow. If the actual “closure” is abrupt, that might argue for a wait and see approach or a alternatively necessary intervention (even if the procedure as an original intervention has not been demonstrated to be efficacious).

Theravadaz 04:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theravadaz (talk • contribs)

JMIR article

[edit]

Hi,

I've sent you an e-mail on your gmail, please let me know if you haven't received it.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:43, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Lakes Gliding Club

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Great Lakes Gliding Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 18:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great Lakes Gliding club was a linked page without content on a "Did You Know" article today - UTIAS Snowbird. The speedy delete tag was placed on the stub page before the reason for notability was included. See the article's talk page. Dlodge (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New medical organization

[edit]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cardiothoracic Surgery Network

[edit]

The article Cardiothoracic Surgery Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not seem to have any sources for notability -- in fact no sources at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014

[edit]

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.[reply]

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors

[edit]

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter

[edit]


Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 1, June/July 2014
by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery


This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.

note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

IEG grant
CFCF - "IEG beneficiary" and editor of this newsletter.

I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.

Wikimania 2014

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.

Integration progress

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.

  • Swedish
    Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
    Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
  • Dutch
    Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
  • Polish
    Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
    (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
  • Arabic
    The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
Integration guides

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [4]

News in short

To come
  • Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
  • Proofreading drives

Further reading



Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Peer review invitation

[edit]

Hello Daniel,

I am editor-in-chief of a project in development in Wikiversity called Wikiversity Journal of Medicine (more information at Wikiversity Journal of Medicine/About).

I'd very much appreciate if you did a peer review of an article that was recently submitted to this journal:

This is essentially a shortened version of the Wikipedia article on that subject, in own words.

The peer review is preferably written in the corresponding talk page, and should include a declaration of any conflicts of interests. Comments should be constructive, include both strengths and areas for improvement, and be referenced whenever possible. Otherwise, the journal has no strict rules regarding the structure and length of a peer review. Still, more guidelines for peer reviewers can be found at: Wikiversity Journal of Medicine/Peer reviewers.

We prefer peer reviews to be returned within 3 weeks, and appreciate in any case a reply regarding whether you are interested or not in this contribution.

Best regards,

Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully decline

[edit]

I have no expertise on FAS, but I am able to peer review articles related to cardiac surgery. Dlodge (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know anyways. I'll keep that in mind in case we get a cardiac surgery article submitted. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 13:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Dlodge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,937 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dlodge&oldid=1081166209"