User talk:Djrobb

Djrobb, (Dave?), first let me say Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope that you don't take this deletion nomination for PiKA the wrong way. It's a well written history, it's just outside the scope of Wikipedia. The relevant policies are Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider and to a lesser degree Wikipedia:Notability (people). The page should probably be hosted on College of William and Mary webspace, perhaps http://djrobb.people.wm.edu/? I can help you move it there. I've suggested that the page be Userfied instead of Deleted, meaning that it will be moved to your user page for the time being, instead of wholesale deleted. For your conveinience I've also added the standard welcome message below - it has several useful links for new editors. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you maintain http://www.wmpika.org/. As that page is linked to from Pi Kappa Alpha, why not maintain the history there? -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Djrobb, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further reply

I've copied your reply here to keep all the discussion in one place:

Thanks for being patient with me, I am new to this. I moved the page from wmpika.org to wikipedia. The platform provides a great way for users to grow the history records of this important organization. Its obviously still a work in progress as is everything on wikipedia. There hasn't been a lot of activity yet because I have not announced its existence yet to the thousands of interested alumni and members of the broader community.

I have been trying to figure out the specific reason this article should be disqualified from wikipedia by looking at the criteria. It seems to fit on the site pretty well as it is notable in that it was one of the first fraternities at the College that invented the Greek system.

It is also very similar to the following wikis that have not been nominated for deletion:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Lambda_Chi_Alpha http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kappa_Alpha_Order http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sigma_Alpha_Epsilon http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pi_Kappa_Alpha

The information is verifiable.

The article is not original research.

It is not a definition.

It is not trivia.

It is not a blog.

It is not a personal history, It is not a forum, a travel guide, a memorial, a news report, a directory or manual.

In many ways it is similar to histories of clubs on wikipedia that have been deemed to fall within the wikipedia guidelines:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Hellfire_Club http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Chaos_Computer_Club http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Slimelight_Club http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Turtle_Club

The problem is that it is a chapter of the fraternity, not the fraternity as a whole. PiKA as a national organization clearly deserves an article, but has the local chapter done anything historically meaningful enough to merit an individual article? Of the clubs you mention: the first is historically notable, the second is active in current events, the third is a location, and the latter is probably not notable, although does have some historical interest.

The article is essentially a personal history, just not a history of one person, if that makes any sense. Is this particular chapter any more notable than any other chapter of the fraternity? While the notability criterion is debateable (it's not technically official policy), there is still a problem with the fact that Wikipedia is not a web host: this is the sort of information much more appropriate to the site you moved it from than Wikipedia itself.

The main reason I have listed it for AFD is to see what other people think about the notability of the article. AFD is a debate towards consensus, not simply a vote and most certainly not a sure deletion; I've had my own articles nominated in the past. Other users will eventually weigh in on the notability of the article to establish a community consensus.

I'd also like you request that you please sign your posts on the talk page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. This puts your name and the time that you wrote the comment. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where to have the discussion?

We should have it on the talk page for the article. I'll help you move stuff later. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 19:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pi Kappa Alpha - Gamma Chapter at the College of William & Mary

This now deleted article has been moved to your userspace. Johnleemk | Talk 14:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been moved there temporarily, to give you time to save the information somewhere else - Wikipedia is not a free webhost, so within a couple of days you'll need to move it out of Wikipedia entirely so it can be deleted. You can tag it for deletion after you've moved it out by adding {{db-owner}} into the top of the page. If you're still interested in hosting this in a wiki format, other wikis that take this kind of thing are listed at Comparison of wiki farms. Thanks, -- stillnotelf is invisible 07:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schedule for Moving

First let me say that I am disappointed this Wiki was deleted. No one ever replied to the final justification for notability. Furthermore, no consensus from the wiki community was ever formed.

I am going to be out of town on business until April 5th. I am planning on moving it by April 8th. Please do not remove the page until then. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djrobb (talk • contribs) 16:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Have you moved it out yet? -- stillnotelf is invisible 18:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_221_Richmond_Road.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_221_Richmond_Road.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_303_Richmond_Road_in_1927.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_303_Richmond_Road_in_1927.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Bozarth_1982_205_Richmond_Road_1933-1938.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Bozarth_1982_205_Richmond_Road_1933-1938.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Griffith_Francis_St_1939-1942.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Griffith_Francis_St_1939-1942.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Thiems_1982_303_Richmond_Road_1926.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Thiems_1982_303_Richmond_Road_1926.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unit_H_1999-2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unit_H_1999-2006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unknown_Location_1913.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unknown_Location_1913.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unknown_Location_1939.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GammaPikaHouse_Unknown_Location_1939.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GammaPikaHouse UnitD.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GammaPikaHouse UnitD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]