Template:Infobox Network

Hi. I've restored your version of the code for the template header, so that it appears within the infobox--as is standard--rather than above it. This, and adding a couple optional info lines, has brought me to the limits of my coding ability. Request: Is it possible to further modify the code, so an editor has the option of employing the infobox without using a header at all? (See, for example, the use of Infobox Biography in Henry Cowell.) When I attempt this with Infobox Network (that is, either erasing the "name" line or leaving it blank, under any of the recent iterations of the header code), it leaves a little rogue vertical mark in the linespace above the logo image, insteading of eliminating the linespace altogether. (Test, for example, in Mutual Broadcasting System, the article I'm currently working on.) Thanks very much. Best, Dan—DCGeist 01:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eye of london- contact me

Are you the one who own's the pic of the EYE OF LONDON? if so i would like to talk to you about the pic and possible $$$$$$$$$ contact me at danlt888@verizon.net as soon as possible regarding this pic. sinncerr Danny —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.110.224.114 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

London Portal Quote

Is there any system which decides changes to the London Portal quote, or can anyone change it? --Wolf^talk 11:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since there aren't too many London quotes, would it be a good idea to start using the Random portal component template?--Wolf ^{talk | हिन्दी | বাংলা} 09:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do know how to use it. All it does is every time the page gets "purged" or "reloaded", the quote changes. The currently used quote is the last one in the WikiQuote collection.--Wolf ^{talk | हिन्दी | বাংলা} 11:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Manchester dynamic map

Hi, I'm working on a fresh dynamic map. Are there any requirements for this (resolution, size, format etc) that you have so that it will be compatible?

Are their any preferences in colours and features? Do we want major roads/motorways and/or rivers included? Is there a standard? Hope you can help, Jhamez84 21:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you could give me some feedback for Image:Greater Manchester outline map v3.png as a possibility I would be very grateful.

I have the master copy which has each feature stored as a layer which have have instant colour changes or be made to disappear. Any issues, and I can easily address them for you. Thanks, Jhamez84 01:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for the feedback! The lines you refer to are actually motorways and not railways! That this wasn't clear straight away concerns me a little - but not sure exactly how to make the distinction clearer. If you have any ideas...? Glad you like it however. Jhamez84 08:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I've just got back from a busy day so apologies for any delay. I'll spend some time this eve working on the suggestions you and the other users have made - they seem simple things to correct.

I'd be happy to produce some other maps yes! I'm not a proffessional map maker by anymeans, but have enough graphic design skill to put one together. Another user User:Ddstretch has raised a suggestion about changing the actual pointer, perhaps to something with a crosshair? Might be worth considering. I'll get back to you once I've looked at making the motorways a little clearer (I also forgot a stretch of motorway which exists in central Manchester which I need to include). Jhamez84 19:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map is ready. Found at Image:Greater Manchester outline map.png. I think I've addressed all the issues now. Would love to see it in action next! Jhamez84 20:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be more than happy to help! With a bit of luck I will start it tomorrow for you. It would be nice if each city region's map was of a simillar style, but wouldn't want a monopoly on this!!! London's does need a little work like you say however - shouldn't take me too long. May even produce one for our third city (!)... Jhamez84 00:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map redrawn and replaced on Wikicommons - any mistakes or issues, don't hesitate to contact me and I'll try to fix things! Hope the map is well received. Jhamez84 19:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should add it is not as precise as the Greater Manchester map (where the urban areas are drawn tightly) as this not only effects the image size, but I've struggled to find quality source material with which to reference the exact urban boundaries - may be an issue, but see what you think first! Jhamez84 19:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Old Trafford (cricket ground)

Hi, you recently closed a move-article request suggesting that you did not see consensus. While I agree that the page makes it extremely unclear that consensus has been reached, the issues concerned with the move were resolved as illustrated by the following diffs: diff 1 and diff 2. The previously conflicting parties - myself and User:TerriersFan - have been awaiting admin assistance in moving this page to its correct title of Old Trafford Cricket Ground for some time now, as illustrated by talk-page discussions (1, 2). We would appreciate it if you saved us the hastle of relisting just because of unclarities on the talk page.

Regards, DJR (T) 03:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no worries! I've performed the move. Kyle Barbour 22:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St John's oxford user

Hi, I really like all the oxford college userboxes you've made. Would there be any chance of you making a St John's college one? Thanks, Will Trepur99 00:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my Arctic Monkeys EP chronology changes

I'm curious why you reverted my changes ([1] and [2]) to the Arctic Monkeys EP pages. Is there some precedent for including singles in album chronologies? I can't recall ever having seen that anywhere else. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PEJL (talk • contribs) 05:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Quoting DJR's reply here: I'm not sure about precendent, but there has been a long established consensus that EPs are part of the singles chronology, not albums, at least in the case of Arctic Monkeys. DJR (T) 08:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I see. AFAICT EPs are part of album chronologies rather than singles chronologies for at least a vast majority of artists. (Like I said, I've never seen this before, and I've edited hundreds of album pages.) This may simply be because EPs use album infoboxes while singles don't. I'd suggest trying to get this anomaly formalized at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums as a valid option. --PEJL 13:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of EPs varies from artist to artist - many are indeed just short albums. However, releases such as Five Minutes with the Arctic Monkeys have much more in common with a single than an album, and hence the situation with Arctic Monkeys. I don't think there's any need for formalisation - I frankly think it is better left slightly open for interpretation. DJR (T) 18:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Manchester infobox map

Hi, a new version of the Greater Manchester infobox map has been settled upon and uploaded. You've helped set the marker settings before, any chance you could help with Template:Location_map_Greater_Manchester? Hope you can, Jhamez84 11:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to pass comment at this deletion proposal page. Jhamez84 19:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject University of Oxford

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oxford. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Casper Gutman 15:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of unnecessary paragraphs from Tonbridge

Hi Djr xi, noticed you made an edit to the Tonbridge article just to remove some unnecessary line breaks. Just a warning that I've seen some editors get really shirty with people who edit articles just to do that, especially if it doesn't change the appearance of the article. I think it's because it adds unnecessary history to the article and puts extra load on the server, and some people on Wiki seem to just like jumping up and down in an angry manner a lot at the tiniest provocation - so be careful! Regards, Halsteadk 12:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citi.png image

I think the color for the word Citi is gray, not blue. When checking the page that you have reference (http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/press/2007/070213a.htm), it also shows gray text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Z22 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Oxford College infobox

I'm sorry but some places are still not working with that lastest change - see St Edmund Hall, Oxford. PS do you intend to do Cambridge version with light blue? --Alf ^melmac 17:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a thought about this, see my last post at the Wikiproject Oxford University :) --Alf ^melmac 20:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! Thanks for putting the work into improving the look of the infobox template! I hope you approved of my edits to the template this morning -- I like what you did in making the college name bigger, BTW. Casper Gutman 10:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your navbox

Is outstanding, particularly the way you've used positioned divs to layer empty links above the icons to override their default link - ingenious! Anyway, in a vain attempt to tidy up my user pages I've lifted some of your navbox - I hope you don't mind? AulaTPN 14:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Page

Hey man. Stumbled here when I looked for a good roman catholic userbox, I love your "My Travels" box. Make it a template! -Popoi 20:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for complete deletion of section GAWC 1999 Edition [3] !

Reasons: a) outdated study published 8 years ago (conducted even earlier) b) 2004 Edition is available and reflects the current state c) presenting two editions is no extra information value d) The GAWC 1999 studies in general pretends to define a status of major cities but only focuses economic data. This is misleading and already resulted in a widespread citation within Wikipedia major city articles. Proposal: If there are no multiple serious arguments for keeping it, the section should be deleted within the next 7 days. all the best Lear 21 15:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needed you're help

Hi there, I know it's been long...Anyways it'd be great if you could just check my talk page for the last message(Titled: Fluence). I just wanted to know who sent it to me if it's possible to know. Well, being abused for no reason at all is horrible. Thanks. Victoria Eleanor 15:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 15:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much for your help. Really sorry for the trouble. As for the idiots, they have nothing better to do. Thanks one again. Cheers!Victoria Eleanor 05:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I just saw your vandalised pages. Oh man i'm really sorry for all of that. Racism is the main thing i've always hated. Fucking scum bags like him just make everyone's opinion that all whites are racist even more true. And you can't stop everyone generalising on it as well- if one white scum does it then all whites do it. Oh god will this ever come to an end? And don't take this seriously... he also needs to understand that Pakistan and India are two different countries and not one.Victoria Eleanor 06:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really impressed by your sense of humour! And yeah I guess he did get that one bit right!! I join you on that bit as well.Victoria Eleanor 13:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And one more question...don't get me wrong here but on whose side are you indian? I actually find it very amusing when people from different countries get married. Interestantly marriage of people from the same country seems pretty boring to me. I don't know... but you just like to see two people who come from different locations, different cultures and language and different everything to get married and live together under the same roof. And they're so damn madly in love! All the more funny when the two don't understand each others' language. Ha!Victoria Eleanor 13:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got news

This guy has vandalised your page, my page and user:Fluence's page. So much so that he signs in a different IP address and posts messages. You can see his contributions here-[4]] Victoria Eleanor 14:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to tell you

That June (Victoria Eleanor) died today. Please pay tribute to her on her user page. ThanksJade1984 06:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy portal review

Hi. Knowing that you have an interest in an unconnected featured portal, I wondered if you might like to comment on the one I've been working on - energy portal - which is now under consideration for featured status. Compared to other candidates it has had relatively few people contributing to the debate, despite being up for discussion for 2 months. If you have time perhaps you would like to take a look? The candidate page can be found here. Gralo 18:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colleges endowment

Hey, well done for all the work you did adding up-to-date endowment figures to all the college pages. I was wondering if they would perhaps be better placed in the wonderful infoboxes (that I believe you designed?), since it is a relevant stat common to all colleges, and indeed that is where the information is on the University's page, rather than at the end of the lead paragraph. Best, Oudweg 21:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you're probably right - I'll see to that when I've got time, but feel free to do it yourself if you want! DJR (T) 21:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over a Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Scotland county

I note you have worked on this infbox template. The template appears to me to be almost designed to produce nonsensical results. See also Talk:County of Nairn. Laurel Bush (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

UMD

Hey, I saw your discussion at Talk: UMD. Looks like that Sony disc is dead after all. 69.143.226.129 (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Orphaned non-free media (Image:InvictaFM.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:InvictaFM.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the day

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Djr xi/User bad EU

Resolved

– Nominator withdrew nomination

User:Djr xi/User bad EU, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Djr xi/User bad EU and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Djr xi/User bad EU during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Josh Atkins ^{(talk - contribs)} 15:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mfd withdrawn. I'm sorry, I screwed up. --Josh Atkins ^{(talk - contribs)} 17:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking months

Hey Djr, perhaps you were not aware of the recent change to the manual of style, but it is no longer suggested to link months, and it does not affect how others see them displayed any longer. See Wikipedia:CONTEXT#Dates, Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Date_autoformatting, and the discussion about linking dates for autoformatting purposes here. I noticed that you mentioned the reason you were linking months here as " link dates to enable user date preferences to work", and since the change is pretty recent, I thought perhaps you didn't know about it, as I only just found out myself. :) Ariel♥Gold 12:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kit body engh06.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to delete

Please give us a thumbs up or down whether we should delete Global city in Talk:Global_city#Proposal_to_delete_references_to_.22Global_City.22_in_city_articles Kransky (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images for deletion

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Boddingtons.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Boddingtons.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Doxbridge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Doxbridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arms-enfield-lb.jpg

Hello Djr xi, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Arms-enfield-lb.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Djr xi/London place infobox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arms-enfield-lb.jpg

Hello, Djr xi. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Arms-enfield-lb.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Djr xi/London place infobox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arcticmonkeys new.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcticmonkeys new.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CannonSt.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CannonSt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Charing X.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Charing X.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Euston logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Euston logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:KingsCross.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:KingsCross.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:LiverpoolSt.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LiverpoolSt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:LondonBridge.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LondonBridge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Victoria logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Victoria logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Paddington logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Paddington logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Waterloo logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Waterloo logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BirminghamNewSt.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BirminghamNewSt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:EdinburghWav.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:EdinburghWav.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Gatwick station logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Gatwick station logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Leeds station logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Leeds station logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:LiverpoolLimeSt.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LiverpoolLimeSt.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:ManchesterPicc.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ManchesterPicc.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about all of this, but all images, i noticed, after mine got tagged, had no sources AC Best My Contributions Autograph Book 20:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Travelers logo new.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Travelers logo new.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Balliol crest.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Balliol crest.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Boddingtons.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Boddingtons.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Citi pb.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Citi pb.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Monkeys on sofa.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Monkeys on sofa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whothefarethearcticmonkeyspromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whothefarethearcticmonkeyspromo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Five minutes with the Arctic Monkeys.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Five minutes with the Arctic Monkeys.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Citi.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Citi.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Balliol crest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Balliol crest.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Boddingtons.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Boddingtons.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NME oct05.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NME oct05.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Green Templeton 08.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Green Templeton 08.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Trinity crest.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Trinity crest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Citylondonarms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Citylondonarms.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 17:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]