User talk:Djk3
Veganism
[edit]Sure poor people can go to hell, on the other hand your reverting to the unsourced "most vegans" will not stand, don't remove one unsourced but in order to promote your own unsourced beliefs as it looks like bad faith to me. Veganism is a fringe belief with a tiny minority of adherents whereas many people in China only eat rice, at least hundreds of millions, let alone Africa, Latin America etc. Thanks, SqueakBox05:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Caught vs. Killed
[edit]I'm sure you're aldready well aware why the term caught should be used instead of killed. The Soviets caught 48,000 or so humpback whales, whereas they probably killed hundreds or thousands more through whales being struck but lost. So there will always be a difference in the number of whales caught and killed (no matter how modern the techiques used) in whaling statistics. Jonas Poole (talk) 04:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Recent PETA rvt
[edit]You're more diplomatic than me - I'd have reverted and suggested he check out the Delusional disorder page! Bob98133 (talk) 22:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Math v phil
[edit]You have raised a good question about the difference between logic in math, and logic in philosophy. I was not aware of any big division until I got involved with WP. It seems that when we learn this stuff in a philosophy class the professor makes sure to tell everyone that this is studied extensively in mathematics, but when it is taught in a math class the students are given the impression that its math and math alone. I think they see philosophy as some kind of fuzzy thing that's not rigorous, so everybody else is a pretender. A while ago it was a big issue when WikiProject Logic was first set up. We couldn't agree on what is and is not "logic." We ended up with two worklists of articles math, and philosophy, with little overlap. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 02:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the reason you deleted the Controversy section from PETA. What is it? --WikiCats (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Actionpants.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Actionpants.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
