Jump to content

User talk:Dj mike89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commercial use of Image:Jung Da Bin.jpg

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Jung Da Bin.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Jung Da Bin.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Jung Da Bin.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Daniel Mihai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Regancy42 (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dj mike89. You have new messages at Talk:Daniel Mihai.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 16:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies

[edit]

As a new member of WikiProject Biography, I hope you'll note the sourcing requirements of articles on living people. Since earlier this year, all new biographies of living people require verification using reliable sources. This is a general rule across Wikipedia too, but it is now non-negotiable for new bios. Please make sure you base your edits on reliable sources such as newspapers, books, magazines and other sources with a reputation for fact checking. Fences&Windows 00:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]