User talk:Diviwadhwa

Bharat Wadhwa tagged for speedy deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bharat Wadhwa, has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yug Purush Maha Mandaleshwar Swami Paramanand Giri Ji Maharaj

Hello, Diviwadhwa. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yug Purush Maha Mandaleshwar Swami Paramanand Giri Ji Maharaj, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Yug Purush Maha Mandaleshwar Swami Paramanand Giri Ji Maharaj to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 07:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Thanks for message. So many problems. Although it's not a reason for deletion, note that the article title is wrong. It should be just his name, without titles, honorifics etc, as with Gabriel, Albert Einstein and Barack Obama. No saint, swami, professor or president. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted. Although you gave references, they were mostly unacceptable. Apart from a deadlink, they were a mixture of spam links to his books, or "references" to sites that were clearly associated with him. You need proper sources like national newspapers, not hagiographic websites. The World Council of religious leaders is a proper source, but doesn't appear to mention him.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Enlightened Master... The highest title of saints.... Living Legend... dawning of a new era... destined to become an enlightened master of this Age... He revealed early signs of spiritual maturity toward the path of renunciation... and so on. Basically the whole article, right through to Most of all, his compassion, humbleness, and kindness have filled the hearts of his devotees with divine love and the direct knowledge of Brahman is completely over-the-top glorification of this man by his supporters, with ahrdly a shred of verifiable fact. It's about as far from a neutral encyclopaedia article as it's possible to get. Would you write an article in this tone about a religious leader from a Christian or Muslim background?
There are multiple spam links to sales sites for his books, Wikipedia is not free advertising.
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

It's possible that he may be genuinely notable, but it's hard to pick out genuine facts from all the guff. Please note that if you just keep on posting the same text, the article may be protected from being created. If you can write a proper factual article, fine, if you are to close to the subject to do so, best to leave it.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let me know if you want any help Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of link

Hi Diviwadhwa. I removed your link The Direct Realization Of Brahman from Brahman and Nondualism because it is WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTADVERTISING. This means that this link gives undue attention to this guru, and that it reads like an advertisement. By the way, I've added a few links to your draft on Paramand. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Diviwadhwa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji

Hello Diviwadhwa. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yug Purush Paramanand Giri Ji}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]