User talk:DividedByNegativeZero
Welcome!
Hello DividedByNegativeZero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Shanel 05:59, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
I love A Perfect Circle and Tool :)--Shanel 05:59, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Hola, fellow Penny Arcadian! I saw your comment on my Talk Page. How goes the etiquette here - do I reply on my talk page or on yours? In any case, I replied on mine. -Kasreyn 06:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- You know, I never was sure about that. -VJ 06:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Don't be a dick. I've made hundreds of contributions to Wikipedia, and that was one of only two that have ever been for the sake of humor.--Josh 06:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Technically it wasn't even vandalism, since that is the shocker.--Josh 06:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, okay. You got me. -VJ 05:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
put those damned links back stoopid! -User:Armapunk94
Hey, sorry i called u stoopid and used sock puppets. I honestly 4got that my username was Armapunk79 becoz armapunk94 is my AIM sn.
Really Sorry, ♣Chloe Trohman♣ User: Armapunk79
I saw the changes you made in the "Cognitive Ergonomics", page and I think that Neuroergonomics:
- is a distinct field of study, so it should have its own page, even a stub
- is not the same as cognitive ergonomics
So while imho the two subjects should be linked, I don't think that "Cognitive Ergonomics is also known as Neurergonomics". See for example a typical article about cognitive ergonomics here . Thanx for pointing out this field of study though; it seems interesting... Billpapa 13:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey Vijay, I wanted to let you know that I have nominated Arlington County, Virginia as a candidate for US Collaboration of the Week. The article is in need of much help and with a little group effort, it could be brought to Featured Article status! I brought this to your attention as I have seen you have contributed to the article in the recent past and that you hail from there as well. Please cast your vote with your signature at the US Collaboration of the Week page under Arlington County, Virginia. --Caponer 02:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Done. I'll be sure to put some work in on the article later. -VJ 03:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]— Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DividedByNegativeZero. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DividedByNegativeZero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DividedByNegativeZero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Ghost pepper (version 2)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Ghost pepper (version 2) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5 § Ghost pepper (version 2) until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)