User talk:Diretor Adobe
Welcome
[edit]
|
Third-party imagery on Coverage of Google Street View
[edit]Hi Diretor Adobe,
I've removed your last edit to the Coverage of Google Street View article because it lists third-party imagery rather than Google-collected imagery. I've explained my rationale on the talk page: Talk:Coverage of Google Street View#Omit third-party imagery.
TheAckademie (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi again, I just wanted to follow up on the third-party content question. The reason I think it's third-party content is because if you look at the upper-left corner of the Morocco link, for instance, it says "ZEDIX360." If you look up that name on Google, you'll see that's it's a private company that is uploading the content. Notice on this page that Google does in fact accept third-party content, and what you've listed is an example of it. In the talk page for the article, I've listed the sources of the locations you've posted, none of which are produced by Google: Panama is Luis Alvarado, Cyprus is Makro 360, etc. If you're certain they're Google-produced, I would be happy to accept that, but first I'd need to see some clarification. Let me know if you have any questions! :) TheAckademie (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
IP block exempt request
[edit]I would like to make edits when my IP address is automatically blocked. Diretor Adobe (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Google Street View image
[edit]The image that you have changed has many problems. Please update the map, first. For example Pakistan, India and Turkey have partial coverage and must colored with lightblue. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 12:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Please make a request for D97v in commons, add a new topic in User talk:D97v to make a update request. Diretor Adobe (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- You can do it by yourself. So please wait until the image will be updated, then add the new one on the article. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 12:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Google Street View image
[edit]It appears you have added material and then instantly removed it, many times in a row, What is the rationale here? Perhaps I am missing something? Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I note that you never bothered to respond to me. I also note that you have done it again and again. Can you explain these edits should not be viewed as disruptive? And also, ignoring other editors might incline them to doubt the necessity of your presence here. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 14:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Three months later, it seems that now you never will reply to me... Muffled Pocketed 10:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Don't delete discussion tags from wikipedia articles. This is disruption of wikipedia and you you may be blocked for this. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't move content around while the deletion discussion is in process. This could be considered WP:GAMING. Let the discussion run its course and a decision will be made whether to keep, merge, or delete the article. clpo13(talk) 21:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Google Street View
[edit]Please give me a link with Timbuktu and others areas, that you've added. - EugεnS¡m¡on 14:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Coverage of Google Street View
[edit] Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Coverage of Google Street View, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed, even you may be blocked for editing. Sockpuppetry is also a problem if you are User:Compain Here. EugεnS¡m¡on 14:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Google Street View
[edit]Hi Diretor Adobe, I've noticed that you have listed Tunisia as being on Google Street View a number of times. Unfortunately that's not the case, so it would be preferable to refrain from posting that until Google actually releases Street View imagery (which is different from user-contributed Photo Spheres) in Tunisia. I've provided more detail in Talk:Coverage_of_Google_Street_View. TheAckademie (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- @ User:TheAckademie no need to explain what Street view is. His edits are obvious near to vandalism and also unconstructive. Hope he will be blocked if continue doing this. - EugεnS¡m¡on 20:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Coverage_of_Google_Street_View shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Billhpike (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit] You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sjnester. Thank you. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Diretor Adobe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)