User talk:Dionysos1993

Welcome!

Hello, Dionysos1993, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Britney Spears shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--CreecregofLife (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You started it, not me, and your accusation is not correct. Dionysos1993 (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. WP:ONUS CreecregofLife (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on inclusion, you disagree. As I said, if you really want it out, start a discussion / vote. Otherwise, stop reverting with edit warring. Dionysos1993 (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn’t about agreeing and disagreeing. You do not have consensus and the onus is on you to argue for its inclusion CreecregofLife (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, but now its back in the text by another person, which suddenly remains unreverted? Did it got relevant out of nowhere? I also dont see any arguing. Dionysos1993 (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate references

Please try to avoid including duplicate references as you did when editing Bros (film)[1]

See WP:NAMEDREFS. -- 109.76.195.65 (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hogwarts Legacy

Hi Dionysos1993,

Sorry about that, I jumped to conclusions there. There has been a lot of disruptive editing going on at that article and I shouldn't have assumed yours was too. My apologies. I haven't got time to properly go over the sources, maybe I'll get to it tomorrow. Happy editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 00:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I am glad someone looks into it. I noticed that the topics surrounding Rowling remain heated, but in my opinion the focus for that should be on the already separate page. Dionysos1993 (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]