User talk:Dingosnap

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Will Beback 07:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to War of 1812. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Dabbler 17:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Will Beback 01:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pomona College

Glad to see that you are interested in Pomona College. Please be careful in your editing of the article, however—your recent edits added very little information, was not NPOV, and had a tremendous number of spelling and grammatical errors. While some of the information you added appeared to be factual, the imposition of your point of view as well as your lack of attention to detail (making sense grammatically) made it appear that your edits were vandalism. If that is not the case, try to re-add your edits without inserting your point of view. Further, do not remove whole paragraphs unless supported by consensus on the talk page. Reggaedelgado 03:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings

I've restored the warnings that you removed from this page. It is considered bad form and probably against some policy to remove warnings. Mike Dillon 04:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson

If you go to the revision history and do a diff, you'll see that I didn't report your edits as vandalism. It was the subsequent edits by 71.194.134.169 that were vandalism. Your last version is the one that was restored. However, now that you have been kind enough to point this out, it's not really obvious that this "Jackson McNeill" is anyone of significance (for example, although you say he's an actor, there is no listing for him in IMDB.com). So, I'm taking that out as well. If you really think he's important enough to be listed, it can be discussed on the Jackson discussion page. Dsreyn 10:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]