User talk:Dimas gilang

September 2018

Per MOS:FLAGBIO please do not use flags in infoboxes to indicate place of residence, birth or death, as you did at Angel Tee. In gemneral, per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheesehead Brownpants

A tag has been placed on Cheesehead Brownpants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:N

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Comatmebro (talk) 06:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that as the creator of the page, you should not remove CSD tags. I however noticed that it is now a redirect anyway. —Paleo Neonate – 23:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Margareth Angelina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Margareth Angelina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 15:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Margareth Angelina, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 15:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Margareth Angelina. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 15:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pandji Pragiwaksono moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pandji Pragiwaksono, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Margareth Angelina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margareth Angelina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margareth Angelina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 13:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of a page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hddty. (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Above I asked you not to include flags in infoboxes but you have ignored this request at Sergap (TV program). Please do not do so again. This article also had several other issues that I have had to fix. Some of the worst were:

Please ensure the infobox is formatted correctly. Formatting it as you did makes it hard for other editors to edit it, especially when it is necessary to locate and correct errors. Please ensure that you read the infobox instructions, especilly regarding use of first_aired and last_aired; there should only be one date in each field. Note that formt is not a valid field for the infobox.
Please note that, per WP:DATELINK, dates should not be linked.
Please do not include inappropriate formtting, such as the italics that you used. Please see MOS:ITAL for guidance.
Per WP:NOTTVGUIDE, airtimes should not be included.
The "see also" section should only include articles that are not linked in the prose. --AussieLegend (✉) 15:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained immediately above, Wikipedia is not a TV guide so airtimes (i.e. the "Timeslots" section) should not be included. This edit to Seputar iNews also corrupted formatting of the infobox. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:34, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rumah Pilkada) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rumah Pilkada.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

While your efforts for creating this article are appreciated, I don't think this meets WP:NTV or WP:GNG. The only source cited in the article was non-independent, and a Google search only shows 1 independent source. To meet the notability guidelines, you'll need significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent, secondary sources. For now I've redirected the article to Kompas (TV program). In addition, the article would need copy-editing even if it were notable; as it's rather hard to tell what the article is saying in some places. Let me know if you have any questions and happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 01:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:INews (TV program)

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Draft:INews (TV program). Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Delik (TV program), you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 16:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is now the third time that I have had to ask you to format infoboxes properly and not include flags yet Delik (TV program) contains the same errors that you have previously been warned about! --AussieLegend (✉) 16:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UseeTV moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, UseeTV, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 12:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UseeTV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UseeTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UseeTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 08:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of articles

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at UseeTV. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Hitro talk 08:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of INews (TV program) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article INews (TV program) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INews (TV program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 09:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fokus (TV program). AussieLegend (✉) 18:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, where do I start this time? You again recreated Fokus (TV program), which had already been moved to Draft:Fokus (Indosiar news program) back in September. Not only that but you did so with all of the errors that I have warned you about multiple times. This is your final warning to stop this disruptive editing. If you do so again you will very likely find yourself unable to edit. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of articles

You have been warned above, only just last month about asserting ownership of pages but this edit to my talkpage clear asserts ownership over Fokus (Indosiar news program) which should not have been moved from draft space. You do NOT own any articles. As each edit page clearly states, "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone". That includes moving articles that should not be in mainspace to draft space until such time as they are ready to be moved back to mainspace. And please, stop posting banners to my talk page. I have no idea what "Sebuah BintangWiki untuk Anda!" means, nor do I wish to. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Dimas gilang persistent disruptive editing. AussieLegend (✉) 06:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have ignored this notice and you therefore may not have noticed that there are several opinions at the above discussion that all consider that you should be indefinitely blocked from editing. It would be in your best interests to notice this notice and make some form of comment there in defence of your actions to date. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eat Bulaga! Indonesia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indonesian and Wijaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aiman (TV program) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aiman (TV program), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 21:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article ownership AGAIN!

You have previously been told that you do NOT own articles and any editor may edit or move articles that you have created. This edit to User talk:HitroMilanese was completely inappropriate. If you don't want your articles moved to draft space or deleted then please follow the multiple pieces of advice given to you and start creating articles that comply with our policies and gudielines. The problem here is your unwillingness to follow the same rules that every other Wikipoedia editor is supposed to follow. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fokus (TV series)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fokus (TV series).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for developing the article on the news program Fokus. Note that I have changed the title of the article slightly to reflect Wikipedia policies on television shows for which the name is also used in other articles. (See for example Gung Ho (TV series)).

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 03:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

For the reasons given in this thread at ANI. Repeated creation of unreferenced articles and failure to use the AFC process. Unwillingness to hear any feedback from others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fokus (TV program)

The article Fokus (TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:PROMO. Fails of WP:GNG. Also WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 09:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NET. (TV program) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NET. (TV program), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delik (TV program) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Delik (TV program), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dian Mirza moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dian Mirza, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 13:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dimas gilang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dimas gilang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Indonesia Digital HOME

Hello Dimas gilang I have added projects Indonesia, Telecommunications, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 21:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheesehead Brownpants listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cheesehead Brownpants. Since you had some involvement with the Cheesehead Brownpants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dimas gilang, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 16:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NET. (TV program)

Hello, Dimas gilang. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NET.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 06:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Angel Tee

Hello, Dimas gilang,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Angel Tee should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Tee .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kompas (Kompas TV news program)

Hello, Dimas gilang. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kompas (Kompas TV news program), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kompas (Kompas TV news program)

Hello, Dimas gilang. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kompas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]