User talk:Dimah Almahbub/sandbox

The editing sections are very concise and good. The references used are from recent dates that is very useful in case that you need more information. Marialopez pabon (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dimah, I am going to review yoursSSASHWIN (talk) 23:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. You can add hyperlink to ubiquitination as "ubiquitin" is available in the wikipedia

2. Instead of using -1 and -2 you can elaborate them in detail so that while reading we can get a clear idea about it.

3. Add the title for the reference section as "References".

4. No need of comma after the word 'processes' in the sentence " processes, namely, acetylation, phosphorylation"

That's the end of my reviewSSASHWIN (talk) 23:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

peer review

This is very good content. I made some minor grammar edits that help it flow and got rid of some redundant phrases (like explaining metastasis when it is already linked to the page that explains it). Ddoerflinger (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]