User talk:Dileshwar Singh Patil

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Dileshwar Singh Patil, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepstep (musician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deepstep (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- HindWiki^Connect 01:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The DuchAz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The DuchAz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The DuchAz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pranitaa Pandit (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Feel free to re-submit when the subject garners some more coverage in reliable and independent sources such as books, news and/or newspapers. Colloquial sources such as tellychakkar and fuzionproductions are not reliable as per our standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pranitaa Pandit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pranitaa Pandit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dileshwar Singh Patil, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dial911 (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian Institute Of Learning and Development (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indian Institute Of Learning and Development and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Indian Institute Of Learning and Development, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pranitaa Pandit has been accepted

Pranitaa Pandit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 22:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The DuchAz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The DuchAz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/theduchaz/about. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, Dileshwar Singh Patil. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but The DuchAz has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be blocked from editing. Promotional content is vigorously deleted. Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

Wikipedia has many articles in need of improvement. Perhaps you can help.

Category:All articles needing copy edit

Category:Articles lacking sources

Category:Articles lacking in-text citations

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal Cheers, and happy editing. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Awinongya Jr

The article Joseph Awinongya Jr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Awinongya Jr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Awinongya Jr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Awinongya Jr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chantel Zales for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chantel Zales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantel Zales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Razer(talk) 20:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deepstep (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepstep (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepstep (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahmood Ahmadu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmood Ahmadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmood Ahmadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 22:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Etim Effiong

An article you recently created, Daniel Etim Effiong, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello Dileshwar Singh Patil. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dileshwar Singh Patil. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dileshwar Singh Patil|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Lapablo (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lapablo (talk) 04:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong

Hello Dileshwar Singh Patil,

In one of your article summary while moving the page you said that, you were not WP:PAID to write the article. While that may not be true, please do not on any account move the page back to mainspace without the article being reviewed through WP:AFC. If you however wish you can continue editing and when ready use the "submit your draft for review" button. Lapablo (talk) 05:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Dileshwar Singh Patil, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dileshwar Singh Patil|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Lapablo (talk) 00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Etim Effiong (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No changes to the article since last move apart from removing UPE tag.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Lapablo (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong. Thanks! Lapablo (talk) 22:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Etim Effiong moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniel Etim Effiong, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 08:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning!!!

Hi Dileshwar,

Once again you have moved the page Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong to mainspace without allowing it go through WP:AFC as earlier instructed. You cannot move a page you created to mainspace without proper review via AFC because you feel you have fixed the issued. You have taken the first step to make disclosure as to receiving payment to create Daniel Etim Effiong which i have seen on your talk page, Paid editors MUST also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Once that is done feel free to ping me. Lapablo (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lapablo: I had previously pinged you with regards to the draft article and you chose to ignore me even after the disclosure I made you still left this comment instead of further accessing the article you went on and hastily gave me warnings about failing to disclose WP:PAID. To answer your last question I had previously read WP:PAID and had also thoroughly gone through this... and it states "the minimum required is that you disclose your employer, client, and affiliation" of which I have done so and unfortunately I do not advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Regards Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dileshwar Singh Patil I'm sorry about that, i may have missed your pings. Kindly do not move the page to mainspace again without the article being reviewed by an WP:AFC reviewer, someone will get to the page soon. Lapablo (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lapablo: Apology accepted. Uhm hey the draft still has the undisclosed payment maintenance template on it and not to mention both of your comments which in turn affect the reviewing process and let's other reviewers think I never disclosed. Please fix the issues since I've now fully disclosed. Thanks :) Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indian Institute Of Learning and Development for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Institute Of Learning and Development is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute Of Learning and Development until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nizil (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Big Boy Toyz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. creffett (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Boy Toyz (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Etim Effiong (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 19:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Boy Toyz (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All coverage looks to be WP:ROUTINE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Etim Effiong (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of satisfying WP:NACTOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 06:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure

Hello Dileshwar Singh Patil, As per WP:PAID please disclosed link(s) to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services to comply with full disclosure guideline. Thank you. GSS ^💬 06:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS. As per previous discussion with Lapablo. I do not have any active accounts at websites where I advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 08:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then how people hire you to edit Wikipedia? GSS ^💬 10:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly through social media. Quick question, how does Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong not satisfy WP:NACTOR when he is nominated for a major notable award (the Africa Magic Viewers' Choice Awards) for his role in a film through this source? Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 13:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So It means you advertise on social media to attract clients and you need to disclose links per WP:PAID, Regarding Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong see WP:NACTOR#1 and WP:ANYBIO#1. GSS ^💬 13:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Do you mean disclose with links to my social media profile?... Oh and I had read that criteria before like the other ones. However he is not just an actor he also falls under WP:CREATIVE (being a film director) and easily passes it too. According to WP:ANYBIO#1 he passes due to "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." - Africa Magic Viewers' Choice Awards are a well-known award ceremony. I really hope this isn't a case of ethnocentrism Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, ...nominated for such an award "several times" so, one nomination is no enough, the film he directed must be independently notable to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Regarding the link to your social media, yes you need to disclose that link on your userpage. GSS ^💬 15:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Majority of the films and series he has directed & acted on are notable as per WP:TVSHOW "television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations..."- Apart from that the subject meets GNG as he appears in reliable sources This Day...including others cited. I'm sorry GSS but I'm a bit skeptical about your review (as you are mainly a participant on Wikipedia:WikiProject India and not the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria I think you might not be much of an expert on Nigerian media). I would love to hear opinions from our co-editors (including ones from the WikiProject Nigeria regarding Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong. Regarding link to social media, I shall do that Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure why not? also, you have not yet disclosed links per WP:PAID. GSS ^💬 06:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I have further disclosed. Regarding Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong and Draft:Big Boy Toyz where can I post a thread regarding further assessment of the articles? Dileshwar Singh Patil (talk) 05:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asif Bhamla (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asif Bhamla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Asif Bhamla, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 10:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Boy Toyz (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Big Boy Toyz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS343 (talk) 06:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for incompetence as a paid editor.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 15:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Etim Effiong

Hello, Dileshwar Singh Patil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Etim Effiong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Asif Bhamla

Hello, Dileshwar Singh Patil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asif Bhamla".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Big Boy Toyz

Hello, Dileshwar Singh Patil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Big Boy Toyz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]