User talk:Didsomeonesaybacon

Any comments or concerns feel free to message below[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Didsomeonesaybacon! Thank you for your contributions. I am Delta fiver and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 12:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Didsomeonesaybacon, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Didsomeonesaybacon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mustafa Yanaz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustafa Yanaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Yanaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello Didsomeonesaybacon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Didsomeonesaybacon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Didsomeonesaybacon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 06:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. Thank you. GSS ^💬 06:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not receiving financial compensation for Wikipedia edits. I do have another account but it abides by Wikipedia guidelines, I stated it as my alternate account.Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My other account is Aroundthetown333 and it states "It's for when I'm not on a secure network" and it clearly states it's my alternative account. I have simply went to the community portal and edited articles that needed help especially in the area of translation and references. I'm new to Wikipedia and I made a google search to see if I could have two accounts and this is what I found in a wiki article " For example, a user may wish to create an alternate account for use on public computers as a precaution to keep their primary account more secure. Contributors operating any sort of automated editing process should do so under an alternative bot account. It is recommended that multiple accounts be identified as such on their user pages" I abided by these rules. I have not participated in sock puppetry or neat puppetry, I've made honest edits to the best of my knowledge.Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 07:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and which account(s) you used in April and May to create at least 4 articles? Don't forget I have evidence in hand such as your Upwork profile. GSS ^💬 07:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upwork? And Wikipedia is a place to create articles. Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You must have me mistaken from someone else, could you tell me what your talking about?Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 08:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 16:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Didsomeonesaybacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Being framed Didsomeonesaybacon (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.