User talk:Diddlybop-9

November 2024

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Draft:Phil Kelly (Royal Marines), seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Kelly (British marine) (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MWFwiki were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

1. I am not convinced this individual meets notability requirements.

2. Your sources are URLs to websites. We need the actual article links. The only two sources which contain the proper links are sources 4 and 6. Source 6 is dead, and I have marked it as-such. Otherwise, we have numerous other un-sourced assertions and comments within the article.

3. Regarding your contention with the title, it should be "Phil Kelly (Royal Marines officer)" per WP:CONSISTENCY (see Alexander Anderson (Royal Marines officer), Thomas Parke (Royal Marines officer), Charles Menzies (Royal Marines officer), etc. I can assist you with the title change if I wind-up accepting the article submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phil Kelly (British marine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MWFwiki (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]