User talk:Dickputka2.0

Speedy deletion nomination of Luyno

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Luyno, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Luyno, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Multixfer. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 04:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Luyno. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. E x nihil ^(talk) 04:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Luyno. E x nihil ^(talk) 04:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Putka

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Putka, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConCompS (talk) 04:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism, an inappropriate username, and the appearance that you are abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 04:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dickputka2.0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dick Putka is a proper name and the articles that were created were a prank done by my roommate. If Dick Putka is inappropriate please explain why

Decline reason:

The only edits from this account have been vandalism. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are responsible for the actions carried out on your account. If you cannot maintain security over the account, it will need to remain blocked to prevent further abuse by your roommate or other unauthorized parties. —C.Fred (talk) 04:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we're not stupid. How did you know to vandalize my talk page? In any case, we will soon know your sockpuppets and they will all be shut down. Also, we know what "putka" means and it's not a proper name. ttfn. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 04:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Putka is a proper name. want proof? [1] [2][3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickputka2.0 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 10 November 2009

[4] Barocci 05:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three against one Dickputka2.0 (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is irrelevant. The username is not the only issue. Your edits are unconstructive vandalism, and furthermore the deleted version of the article Putka shows your intended meaning is not as a name but as the slang term. Please stop wasting everyone's time, including your own. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]