User talk:Diamond6

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Since you identified this account as being run by a representative of Next Page Entertainment, I would like you to take a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Your article on Xxzotic was recently deleted because of concerns over advertorial bias (see WP:CSD#G11). Please refrain from using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this does nothing to hide your admission of being a company representative. Please don't recreate the Xxzotic article again. If this artist garners critical and commercial success, someone unaffiliated with your company will create a neutral article. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To begin with, don't build the article around a copy of a press release[1]. All articles must adhere to a neutral point of view, so statements like "poised to take the industry by storm" are unwarranted. To maintain an article, artists must also pass a threshold of notability, this is defined at WP:MUSIC. However, since you work for Next Page Entertainment, you are generally excluded from creating any sort of article about an artist with whom you maintain a business relationship. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 03:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thanks for understanding and pointing out the specific criteria. What I can do is restore the article in a barebone state called a stub, and others can add on to it later. Also, could you please forward an e-mail to permissions@wikipedia.org that confirms your release of that photo into the public domain ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 04:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Next Page Entertainment Logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Next Page Entertainment Logo.gif, which you've sourced to {{{source}}}. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Suntag ☼ 15:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]