User talk:Dharmaling
Appearance
Please read WP:V. If a third-party hasn't written about your organization, it shouldn't be here at all. I am trying to help by making your article less flagrantly in violation of our policies. At best, your organization deserves a short article, with a reference to your web site where people can read more. Also, you might be interested in reading our conflict of interest policy. Normally, someone involved with the organization should not be editing the article at all. GlassFET 23:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- We got the point. Thank you. We though that we could join as a group and talk about what we know better than anyone else; but this is "conflict of interest". We requested to be deleted.--Dharmaling 23:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- You needn't leave. No one's angry at you. In fact, you have given many good contributions. You can leave if you'd like, but no one is chasing you off (or at least no one should be). Please don't be frustrated, and feel free to return at any time. The Evil Spartan 00:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- If you do return (which I also encourage), it may be prudent to ask other editors to edit Buddhist Congregation Dharmaling for you, unless they're completely uncontroversial edits (like spelling or formatting fixes). This policy is not meant to insult your obviously good knowledge of your own organization, but is a policy Wikipedia has to enforce for all editors due to people's tendencies to present themselves in a more positive light than is always accurate. Along with the other editors, I will be watching Buddhist Congregation Dharmaling's discussion page in case you want any changes made to the article: I would be more than happy to help you improve it. -kotra (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- We got the point. Thank you. We though that we could join as a group and talk about what we know better than anyone else; but this is "conflict of interest". We requested to be deleted.--Dharmaling 23:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)