User talk:Dhammerindy

AirTran - IND and SRQ/FLL

Yes, I don't see why that's a problem. Since the routes are listed to the end of TRS' current timetable, I think it's okay if we assume the routes aren't seasonal - I have removed the [seasonal] from SRQ and FLL, but we should probably continue to watch the route in the months to come and see if it is dropped back down to seasonal. Thanks for noticing this. Sox 23 20:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Air/handled by Frontier

The same case was true with Big Sky Airlines @ Chicago-Midway earlier this year. Passengers were checked-in and all ground operations were handled by Frontier Airlines, but the flights themselves were operated by Big Sky. If it was "Cape Air operated by Frontier Airlines" then that can be included, but "Cape Air handled by Frontier Airlines" doesn't need to be. Sox 23 20:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AirTran - IND/MIA

Hey- I looked into the schedules and can't find IND-MIA anywhere. The same thing is happening with MDW-PBI- the route is listed on AirTran's route map but it isn't in the schedules, so I removed the flight from the MDW page. I would hold off on adding Miami to the IND page until we can find it in FL's schedules. Sox 23 22:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ground Transportation Section @ IND

Go ahead and add it. What can it hurt? If it gets reverted it gets reverted; no harm in trying. Sox 23 00:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SAN Route Map

I used [www.flightmemory.com FlightMemory.com] to create the SAN Route Map. You need to create an account- when I did it was free; I think it still is. But just add the routes in the Flight Data section, then when you're finished, click on Statistics and the route map will be below. Right click to save it to your computer; edit it with paint to delete "www.FlightMemory.com" at the bottom, and you're good to go. Ask me if you have any other questions. I assume you're creating a map for IND? Sox 23 16:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing IND References

Consider it done...22:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Copyright Image

I'm not very familiar with image licenses...I hate when I get messages from bots that say my images are in copyright violation and stuff like that...but you should probably ask someone better acquainted w/ image licenses about that. The picture does seem very low-res and seems to fit the image copyright at the bottom...but I'm just not sure enough to give you an answer. Sox 23 21:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP Indianapolis

WikiProject Indianapolis		An invitation to join us!
		Your recent edits seem to indicate that you have some local knowledge of Indianapolis, Indiana. If so, perhaps you would like to join WikiProject Indianapolis, a project for the creation, expansion and improvement of articles related to metropolitan Indianapolis. Check out our project page, and if you like what you see, join us by adding your name to our membership list. Hope to see you at WikiProject Indianapolis!

We're always looking for people knowledgeable about Indy to help with articles. Join up if you're interested. --L. Pistachio (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--O sama K 06:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TWA/IND

Hey Dhammerindy, I've added a ^{[citation needed]} to the statement on the airport page. This allows readers to see the info, but at the same time realize that it may not be 100% correct without a citation. Hope that helps. Sox 23 13:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AirTran Focus Cities

As much as I don't like change, I think I have to agree with wikiman/quality control. To keep it accurate, technically only MDW, MKE, and BOS have been listed as "focus cities", even though like Dhammerindy said, they have over 8 n/s destinations from IND (and cities like MDW and BOS keep shrinking but are still listed as focus cities). The only way I'd include the previous focus cities is by contacting AirTran's customer service and asking them if they know what cities FL considers to be "focus cities." Sox 23 15:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the airlines all have their own benchmarks as to exactly how much non-hub flying constitutes the naming of a focus city. For instance, Nashville has some non-hub flying on American, as have they in the past with US Airways and Northwest, Baltimore still has some non-hub flying with US Airways, Kansas City had some non-hub flying with US Airways, Tampa still(or did until fuel prices rose) has some non-hub flying with Delta, Hartford has some non-hub flying with Delta, and Austin has a high flight volume with Jetblue but non of those airports are any longer or ever have been focus cities for those airlines. I think it's all about that magic number or the future growth plans that an airline still has for a city that gives it that edge to get the focus city title. If you compare your NWA operation with Airtran you'll see that that NWA in your city is much more like BWI which Airtran actually calls a focus city than Airtrans operation there in Indianapolis which is why NWA is a focus city officially and Airtran is not. Please know I'm not trying to pick on your city at all but rather just trying to maintain accuracy between the article and the website for the company it represents based on what it says the knowledge that I have. If you were to email AirTran and they told you differently than I am more than happy to accept being wrong and learn something new. Let me know what they tell you if you do. QualityControl3533 (talk) 06:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I think what you'll see happen is that like PHL, Midway will relocate to the historical list on the history page of AirTran.com and cease to show up in New Presentations and Publications once service drops below a certain point. Another good example is CMH for Delta. They just ultimately quit including them in the list on Delta's website. I also think that as operations like Tampa continue to grow which is the largest operation not labled a focus city that will begin to show up in presentations and publications. You can also email AirTran per Sox23's reccomendation which was a good one and get a new list(just post their reply on the article's talk page when you get it back and update the list accordingly) or if you can find something from a newspaper that talks about those expansion planes you mentioned that might be enough to put IND back on. QualityControl3533 (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-list it with that as the citation and lets see how it looks after this Fall. QualityControl3533 (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IND Page

Hey Dhammerindy- Sorry I haven't been on wiki in awhile. I was busy moving in to college. Your changes look fine. I don't think people will object to them. If you need any help I'll be around. Sox 23 17:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TOCs in airport articles

It has been noted that you have changed the placement of TOCs in a number of airport article. Please note this has been brought up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports and your are welcome to comment. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you joined WikiProject Aviation??

Greetings, I noticed your postings on the WP:AIRPORTS talk page, and it appears you have not joined WP:AVIATION yet. I would love to invite you to the wiki project, feel free to ask any questions, if you have any. I also noticed you have been doing alot of work on airport articles, and once you feel like you've done enough I would be glad to review them, and bump them up to a higher level article. -Marcusmax (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may join at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Members, just add you name to the right section. -Marcusmax (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dhammerindy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dhammerindy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IND-International.png

Thank you for uploading File:IND-International.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]