User talk:Dgreatgnazzini

Notability of Heterogenous Input Neuration

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Heterogenous Input Neuration, by Jaksmata (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Heterogenous Input Neuration seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Heterogenous Input Neuration, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hi, John. It seems like you're a fellow of wide-ranging interests, which is exactly the sort of person that makes a good Wikipedia editor. I'm also glad to see a fellow signatory of the Agile Manifesto around. However, it looks like you haven't spend much time getting familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'd suggest you start with our five pillars and Wikipedia:Article development. Given your contributions, I'd ask you to carefully read WP:COI before adding any more material to Wikipedia. Thanks, William Pietri 00:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dan gnazzo

A tag has been placed on Dan gnazzo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 15:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Dan gnazzo. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. (And no: high school All-American is not notability by our standards; that is "usually considered to mean the Olympic Games, or World Championships.") --Orange Mike | Talk 23:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eden Prairie, Minnesota, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pubik Bay, Minnesota

The article Pubik Bay, Minnesota has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that any such feature exists on Devil's Elbow Lake.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJH (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pubik Bay, Minnesota

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pubik Bay, Minnesota, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]