User talk:Dfucehucvruevc
A tag has been placed on Blothello, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Puchiko (Talk-email) 17:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Blothello has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Captain-tucker (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to the page Blothello constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Queenie Talk 18:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Blothello. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Queenie Talk 18:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Blothello. Queenie Talk 18:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]I have blocked you for twelve hours so that you may have time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, as your recent edits have been wholly unacceptable. faithless (speak) 19:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Blothello, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
You're correct to suspect that you're going to very shortly be blocked for adding nonsense pages to Wikipedia. If you'd like to make up words and pretend that they are in widespread use, you might try Urban Dictionary or Wiktionary. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)