User talk:Dflovett
Dflovett, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Dflovett! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC) |
March 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm CityOfSilver. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Serge F. Kovaleski, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CityOfSilver 19:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Proksch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Michelle Wolf
[edit]You were correct in the idea to remove needless extras, but seeing as the vast majority of media coverage of her speech was criticism (even CNN were unusually critical [1]) and seeing that this was indeed the first such event to include such profanities these points are significant enough to be mentioned. Branding all the reviews as just 'criticism & praise' is a gross misrepresentation of the true response. Tim (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you - because it's a very fresh news story, let's see how things progress, how the fire dies down, and then see if it needs to be updated. - DFLovett
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basilica Block Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basilica of St. Mary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Dflovett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dflovett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Brief slugs
[edit]If all you want to type is a brief slug, please do so in draftspace, such as Draft:Periscope (agency). There is insufficient information or source material in Periscope (agency) to satisfy the requirements of WP:NCORP. I have redirected the title to its parent company. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Niko Pueringer for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niko Pueringer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Pueringer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit (blether) 20:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit] Hello. Your recent edit to Stillwater Area High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. It is your responsibility to properly link any names you add to notable people or alumni lists. Also, if there is no sourced content in the individual's wiki-bio tying them to the community or school, you must provide that. These things are not optional. If you do not know how to create a wikilink or a reference, please make use of the Teahouse. They're more than happy to help you. John from Idegon (talk) 03:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
[edit] | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This warning is to let you know that biographies of living people are subject to certain restrictions. In particular, putting unproven allegations into the lead sentence of a biography is against Wikipedia policy. Allegations can be in the text of the article, and sometimes even in the lead section, but not in the lead sentence that defines who/what the person is. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Jack Allison for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Allison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Allison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm good with it being deleted. It seemed warranted but I have a hard time arguing for why it needs to exist. - DF
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AB InBev brands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accelerator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jucy Lucy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Nook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Dflovett
Thank you for creating Blue Door Pub.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Article was tagged by another reviewer in February 2020. IMO WP:notability is borderline. Not so weak to take this to AFD, but not strong enough where I'm comfortable with removing the tag. Suggest finding & adding another source or two with in-depth coverage and also development more text from those sources. I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 16:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of CO2 Partners for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CO2 Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Bbarmadillo (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Faatemah Ampey for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faatemah Ampey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mccapra (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Sharky tale (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristi Yamaguchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gull Lake.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jucy Lucy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Nook.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Salo (business) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salo (business) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
MB 16:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about The 20 MSP
[edit]Hello Dflovett, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The 20 MSP, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 20 MSP.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wasianpower}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)