User talk:Dfass

Welcome!

Hello, Dfass, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elia Levita

You added a statement that Elia Levita wrote the first Yiddish-Hebrew dictionary, but gave a name that does not appear anywhere else on the web. I've cut it to Talk:Elia Levita pending citation. - Jmabel | Talk 03:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Check [1], which references this book. My source, however, was the Junior Judaica (1982). If that's acceptable to you, you could replace the text? Thanks. Dfass 04:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I take it the spelling was from the Junior Judaica? In any case, could you (in general) be more specific about what you are citing from where? You're doing a lot of good stuff, but you are also going to create a lot of work for other people if you don't cite clearly. - Jmabel | Talk 05:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, when taking any substantial passages from the Jewish Encyclopedia, be aware of {{JewishEncyclopedia}} as the preferred way to cite. - Jmabel | Talk 05:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Colon Trabotto

I have removed the ^{[citation needed]} tags; everything in that article can be sourced to the cited article in the Jewish Encyclopedia. You may have been confused by some empty brackets in the article; these were places where the original article had Hebrew characters not copied across.--Runcorn 21:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Albalag

Sorry about that, I didn't realise the source was in the public domain, my mistake. I have undeleted the article.--Konst.able 05:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a pretty good article. I could try to get it on the "Did you know" (from Wikipedia's newest articles) section on the main page if you want. How about:

(Did you know)...that Isaac Albalag was a Jewish philosopher of the second half of the thirteenth century whose liberal interpretations of the Biblical account of the Creation in accordance with the Aristotelian theory of the eternity of the world, stamped him in the eyes of many as a heretic?

--Konst.able 06:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 October, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Isaac Albalag, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Konst.able 06:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simeon ben Zemah Duran interwiki

Hello,

When you added the interwiki I tried it and it didn't work. Now, at apparently the same name, it is 100% fine. Thank you, DGtal 18:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delinking dates

Hi Rich. So what's the policy with linking dates? I thought I had read some Wiki guide that said linking dates is helpful because it lets people display dates in different formats. Is that not the case? Personally, I couldn't care less, but I want to do the right thing. Thanks! Dfass 14:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely right. But formatting will only be applied where the month and day number are present - e.g. April 13 or 12 May 1977. Things like "2002", "January" and "March 1997" by themselves should only be linked under normal "make links only where relevent in context" guidelines. E.G. "May" in the article Maypole or maybe "1066" in Battle of Hastings, "Friday" in Sabbath and so forth. Rich Farmbrough, 14:42 13 November 2006 (GMT).

Another thing you may find useful to know is house style on headings WP:MSH. Basically things are only capitalised if they would be in normal English usage. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 17:08 13 November 2006 (GMT).

Nathan Marcus Adler

[2]: citation? - Jmabel | Talk 00:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua ben Hananiah

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Joshua ben Hananiah, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=551&letter=J. As a copyright violation, Joshua ben Hananiah appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Joshua ben Hananiah has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Joshua ben Hananiah. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Joshua ben Hananiah, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 01:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hi, Just wanted to apologise for tagging your article for deletion, I was unaware of the Jewish Encyclopaedia and its public domain status. Rest assured, it's all now stored in my head and you'll not have to worry about a repeat of this incident from myself in future, and I'll keep an eye out for any of your work to make sure nobody else tags your articles for speedy deletion in future. Best Wishes and Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 16:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

still on the above, i took the liberty changing the rest of the transliterations per Wikipedia:Jewish_Encyclopedia_topics & linked one or two things. i was very carefull, thos you might want check (no background knowledge, cld have stuffed up). i sympathise w/ your comment about j e spellings, i remember taking a very long time to find, i think, the vilna gaon when i 1st found that site...  ⇒ bsnowball 10:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
ps, very good article, most of those cut&pastes frm je are really just that. & does their biblio need to be copied, not sure, but i think the usual is cite what your quoting, & if reader want to go further, they refer back there?  ⇒ bsnowball 10:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
true, none of above is particularly important :) what i forgot that might be (or less uninportant) are that a link to the e j article is needed not just to the entire thing (also as source) given that they can be um, immaginatively titled. & some of the links to volumes of talmud thru abreviations end up as double re-directs because some of the titles themselves are redirects to the relevant seder, there not yet being an individual article. i did change all that i found on that article.  ⇒ bsnowball 10:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sabato Morais

Sorry about any edit conflict; I had already rewritten it and was trying to save it when you construction-flagged it. I hope my changes helped, but in any case, I am done with it for now. Good luck! Chris the speller 20:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, my changes went in just before you added the picture, and were not lost. Chris the speller 21:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rav Zeira

Hi dfass, I noticed that you changed the article page of rav zeira as a redirect to Ze'era. I was the creater of the original article. I think that the more corret name is the original articles name. just like Rav Huna, Rav Chisda and others. So I would like to put all your [excellent] work on the article back to the original page.

Also, whenever you want to chang the name of an article, you should never use the "copy and paste" method, but rather use the "move" tab on top of the article. This is the correct way to do it and it save all the page history to the new article name.

you can respond on my talk page. --Shlomke 16:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Great work. --Shlomke 17:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time of day

"downtime on Wikipedia is infrequent and generally limited to the early-morning hours (1am–5am)": without a timezone, this doesn't mean much. - Jmabel | Talk 19:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and Wow!

Hi Dfass: I wanted to add my words of welcome and to thank you for all your additions from the Jewish Encyclopedia. Wow! You are doing a great job. Perhaps at some point soon you may want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Categorization and add the correct categories to each article you copy, and since you have focused on so many rabbis, take a look and see if you can see how to tag your articles following Category:Rabbis and its sub-categories. Also take a look at Category:Judaism and Category:Jews and Judaism for a good overview of articles pertaining to Jews and Judaism on Wikipedia. Once again, thanks for the great job you are doing, it will enrich Wikipedia's Jewish content. Please join Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism. Feel free to call on me. Best wishes, IZAK 09:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

borges

can't help much w/ that (unless u speak spanish) its from a story called 'El Idioma de John Wilkins' in the spanish collected works, it isn't in 'labyrinths', the commonly avail. penguin collection. i have this from a bio of michel foucault who quotes it in the intro to a book of his, so i don't even know if its been trans into english. sorry. re the above, what i was doing was changing the links to volumes of talmud to the full title (think this is better than the abreviation redirects), not sure about who fixes double-redirects. ben. ⇒ bsnowball 10:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bolding Hebrew

Hi: Over the years a number of editors involved with articles that have Hebrew in the titles essentially agreed not to bold the Hebrew names but only the the English titles. Please ask User:Jfdwolff for his input as he was the one to insist on this. Thanks. IZAK 07:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Islam related literature. peace. --Striver 12:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Palestinian rabbis

What does one make of the new Category:Palestinian rabbis and Category:Talmud rabbis in Palestine, should they be renamed to something like Category:Rabbis of ancient Palestine? so that it does not connect, and become confused with, the way the word "Palestinian" is used today (meaning the very unJewish modern Arab Palestinians, who have nothing to do with these rabbis!) Thanks. IZAK 09:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I have created a solution: See Category:Rabbis of the Land of Israel and Category:Talmud rabbis of the Land of Israel. Thank you. IZAK 14:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hi Dfass: Thanks for contacting me, see my detailed response at User talk:IZAK#Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion. Best wishes, IZAK 12:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again: I have responded again, follow same link above. Thanks. IZAK 07:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Hebrew

Hi Dfass: A technical note to remind you that you need to insert [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] in order for "Hebrew" to link to the Hebrew language, and not plain "Hebrew." Also, the correct name for "Palestinian Talmud" is Jerusalem Talmud. Thanks. IZAK 16:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

You're right, it's Yehuda Berg he actualy runs the center whereas the Pa does the the thinking. frummer 06:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

created - Yehuda Berg.

Update

You said yourself it's from the 1906 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia, I think I must point out that that's over 100 years old.

Jehiel ben Samuel Pisa

The article you wrote, Jehiel ben Samuel Pisa, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article.Eli Falk 07:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kaufmann geschichte.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaufmann geschichte.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Akiva

Sorry, must not have seem the template. Best, --Shirahadasha 07:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Congratulations on the construction of the elegant template for Rabbinical Literature. That is a nice addition. -- Dauster 19:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working together

Dfass- Thanks for the Hello- We have managed before to work at the same time on articles. Since I usually create sections for the article, then it is unlikely that we will have an edit conflict. We did OK on Isaac Breuer at the same time and on Mesechet Azilut this morning. I know there have been others that we did at the same time. I usually add sections, categories, bibliography, external links. I do not usually touch your text. All the best --Jayrav 04:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kohelet rabbah manuscript.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kohelet rabbah manuscript.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Article tagging for editing

All articles, including those featured on the main page, are under construction. This is the very premise of a wiki. The under construction template is for articles that are in such a state of incomplete editing that they could be misinterpreted as being nonsense. These short-lived templates are designed to give you time to complete your in-process edits without having to contend with db-nonsense and prod-csd(A1/A3) tagging by other editors. It is NOT intended to convey anything to the reader-only page visitor, and should not be used to say "I have big long-term plans for this article, come back later and see my work". Jerry lavoie 20:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nazuraiun

Hi David: What do you make of Nazuraiun? Thanks, IZAK 10:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazuraiun. Thank you. IZAK 13:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this?

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_13#Category:Jewish_Encyclopedia --FeanorStar7 23:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your well-written comment on the category question; I totally agree; there seems to be a lot of underlying negativity regarding this decision if you look at the other comments for delete. Strange; one person accuses me of completely misunderstanding the issue, but another person changed their vote due to your comment which was very similar to my reasoning. Those wacky Wikipedians! sigh; anyway, I finished my quick survey of adding appropriate categories to the biographies in the JE cat in case they delete it. Thanks for reading. --FeanorStar7 08:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you edited the Kabbalah article

I saw that you edited the aforementioned article. I would like to invite you to join my new wikiproject; Wikipedia: WikiProject Kabbalah. Thanks. Lighthead 23:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can play a minor role and still be a participant if you want. It's up to you. Let me know. Lighthead 18:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewish descent" versus Jew

See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#"Jewish descent" versus Jew concerning the problems of using the term "Jewish descent" versus "Jew" as well as the related proposal. Thank you, IZAK 10:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham ben Solomon Treves

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Abraham ben Solomon Treves, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Propaniac 15:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rabbinical Literature

Regarding {{Rabbinical Literature}}, you've made this a Beta - In Use template since January. Is there any hope of making it live at some point in the near future? JFW | T@lk 12:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Alexander altmann smile.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander altmann smile.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 09:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Hildesheimer seminary 1933.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Hildesheimer seminary 1933.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 09:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Alexander altmann portrait.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander altmann portrait.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 09:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 09:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alexander altmann smile.png

After I gave my reply, I started writing a fair use rationale for the Altmann portrait. There are a couple things that still need to be added: 1) source information on the picture, including photographer or illustrator name if available, and publication details of book edition it appeared on 2) I left some bracketed questions about the image in the rationale that should be answered so that it can be considered complete. Please tell me if there's anything more I can do. Best, nadav (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claimed Messianic prophecies of Jesus

vote now Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claimed Messianic prophecies of Jesus --Java7837 19:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Porphyry bust

Hello,

I would like to use the image you uploaded: Image:Porphyry bust.jpg, on Catalan Wikipedia, but I can't use it outside English Wikipedia because there are some details missing. Could you please upload to commons? You can use the same license, commons:Template:PD-US. I would upload it myself but I don't know the author nor the year of publication.

Thanks, --Meldor 20:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Alexander_altmann_smile.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander_altmann_smile.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harry_wolfson_portrait.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Harry_wolfson_portrait.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 15:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Circuit minimization

Please see my note at talk:circuit minimization. --Trovatore 06:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rough sets cover.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rough sets cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hildesheimer_seminary_1928.png

I have tagged Image:Hildesheimer_seminary_1928.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 16:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moses Hagiz

It looked like an editor was using the article to fluff up Yoffen. I, therefore, removed the references to her in the article and left the one reference at the bottom of the article. --Yeshivish 07:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One removed reference was to the fact that he was an important figure. We don't Yoffen in 2008 to tell us that he was important. It's analogous to writing a paper on Napoleon and then shoving the paper into the Napoleon article because the author of the paper also thinks that Napoleon was important.

The second reference that I removed was "Carlbach focuses on three of the most important episodes ..." What Carlbach focuses on is not important to Chagiz. It is therefore obvious that an editor (not you) put these references to puff up Carlbach.

The removed references do not in any way effect the substance of the article.--Yeshivish 15:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cue validity & Base rate

I was following the directions on the Category:Psychology page to put articles into subgroups rather that the general category Category:Psychology, a category that is so large it is meaningless. Category:Psychology is considered a problem category by Wikipedia for this reason. I got involved in an altruistic attempt to help Wikipedia out with this problem. (I should have known better!) As to your particular articles, I tried to put them in a reasonable subcategory, or sub subcategory of Psychology as that is the correct procedure. (I personally do not care what subcategory it goes into and feel fee to change it. Just put it in some subcategory per Wikipedia directions or make a new subcategory for it.)

If an article is in Category:Psychology by virtue of having Category:Psychology on it directly, that pretty much says it is an orphan Psychology article and has no fellow articles, or alternatively, adding Psychology is redundant and the article would be there anyway indirectly without gorging the general pile in Category:Psychology. Articles that are well categorized end up in Psychology through a subgroup. For example, Bipolar disorder, by means of being put in Category:Mood disorder, ends up in Psychology because the article on Mood disorder defines the Category:Mood disorder and is in general category Mood Disorder which is in Category:Psychology so there is no need of putting it in twice by adding Psychology to Bipolar disorder.

However, I am bowing out of this enterprise anyway. The number of articles in Category:Psychology is way too massive and it is a hopeless task. Most people sticking Psychology on their article do not know what they are doing and do not bother going any further and subcategorizing it. And being a psychologist myself, it is depressing to look through it, much of it junk, and I am done. Put your articles wherever you like. Altruism is overrated! Regards, --Mattisse 14:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A hobby perhaps, but hopefully not a joke.

I suggest reading Wikipedia:Overcategorization. Why makes life harder for Wikipedians, even if it is a hobby to you? I wonder if you realize how much work goes on behind the scene by others, for your hobby? Regards, --Mattisse 02:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious discussions about using the names Reform vs. Progressive Judaism

Hi Dfass: Please see the present discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks#WikiProject Judaism needs help - geographical bias concerns. Your input would be greatly appreciated. (They are the result of discussions that unfolded at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about duplicating Reform and Progressive labels.) Thanks so much, IZAK 00:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mekhilta lauterbach title.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Mekhilta lauterbach title.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the image. Please add a better fair use rationale to the image before the bots find it again. Also, I cant find it in the renewal databases under Lauterbach or Mekhilta so it may be covered by {{PD-US-no-renewal}}. John Vandenberg 08:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Friedlander portrait.png

Hi, could you clarify where you obtained this image from, as it would be good to move this to commons in order to appear on s:Author:Michael Friedländer. Thanks, John Vandenberg 08:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Value granulation.svg

A tag has been placed on Image:Value granulation.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Value granulation.svg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pardes Rimonim title.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pardes Rimonim title.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input with Saudi Arabian Jewish history

Hi Dfass, hope all goes well. Maybe you can help improve the History of the Jews in Saudi Arabia article. It links to smaller articles about Jewish tribes in the areas of present-day Saudi Arabia, such as Banu Awf, Banu Harith, Banu Jusham, Banu Najjar, Banu Sa'ida, Banu Shutayba and they all cited sources. Now User:Bless sins is requesting "sources" for the same information about the tribes in the History of the Jews in Saudi Arabia article, as well as making other requests for sources and whatnot. (If you like, and have a minute or two, see the discussions that have been taking place at Category talk:Jewish Saudi Arabian history.) Please help out in the History of the Jews in Saudi Arabia article. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isaac_breuer_portrait.gif

I have tagged Image:Isaac_breuer_portrait.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rabbinic Literature template

I reverted your latest addition to the template thinking that I understood the template's rationale/working hypothesis and not realizing that you initiated the template in the first place. Please excuse my boldness. On the other hand, I still feel my revert is justified. —חנינא (talk)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ozar Yisroel title.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ozar Yisroel title.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nahum_sarna_portrait.jpg

I have tagged Image:Nahum_sarna_portrait.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Altmann title mendelssohn.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bodleian hebrew catalog.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bodleian hebrew catalog.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Isidore epstein title.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Isidore epstein title.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Abraham_abulafia.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Abraham_abulafia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 07:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sherwin_wein_photo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sherwin_wein_photo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, ~~barnstars~~, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, ~~barnstars~~, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Freidlander perplexed.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Freidlander perplexed.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Bayesian Network pictures

Hello, you have made some nice pictures of Bayesian Networks and variable interaction. Did you use any kind of special software for this? I need to create some larger images for my thesis and creating such images by hand is somewhat ugly. --134.93.143.240 (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Abraham abulafia.jpg

File:Abraham abulafia.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Abraham abulafia.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Abraham abulafia.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research at Pirkei Avot

What you're doing at Pirkei Avot looks cool. But I'd suggest that you post it on a blog. You're violating both WP:SYNTH and WP:OR by doing it on Wikipedia. I'm pointing this out because it will eventually be deleted, and it seem like you're putting a lot of work into it. It would be a shame for you to do that when there's no hope of it remaining in the article.

Also, the second line of "im ein ani li mi li" does not contain the word "only". That's a common mistranslation. -Lisa (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Pines GP cover.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pines GP cover.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Midrash tehillim page.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Midrash tehillim page.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Wolfson title.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wolfson title.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sarna cover.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sarna cover.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Portraits etched in stone.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Portraits etched in stone.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interlinks to Hebrew wikipedia and the article Haninah

Hi,

I've seen you have recently edited the article Haninah, and since i'm lately making interlinks of all kinds of Chazal sages to Hebrew Articles, i'd like to ask if Haninah article does not refer to "Hanina Segan ha-Kohanim" sage - am I correct? (are these are two different sages?)

ThanX.

--Midrashah (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bechor-shor-gad.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bechor-shor-gad.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Guttmann cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Guttmann cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Isaac Husik Albo translation.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Isaac Husik Albo translation.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mordecai Benet

Dear Dfass

You have copied this article from the Jewish Encyclopedia.

You mentionned he studied at Ettingen. The J E mentions Ittingen.
You mentionned this town in Alsace, but the link indicates in Switzerland.

Have you checked? Best regards --FLLLFrance (talk) 11:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Talmud rabbis of the Land of Israel

You contributed to the recent discussion at WP:Cfd. The closing editor recommended that a discussion be started on a new name and we should seek consensus there before proceeding to Cfd again. I've opened such a discussion on Category:Talmud rabbis of the Land of Israel and invite you to participate. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Jastrow title.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jastrow title.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mekhilta lauterbach title.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mekhilta lauterbach title.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simeon ben Gamliel II

What made you decide that the author of Einleitung in die Mischna is N. Brüll? It seems from http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/11294-nahum-of-gimzo that the author is J. (JAKOB?) Brüll. -- -- -- 21:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC) (Fri. 5:09 PM local time)[reply]

Sorry, I have no recollection. It was a long time ago. If it's wrong, please fix it. Thanks. —Dfass (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for responding.

כתיבה וחתימה טובה

-- -- -- 20:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IEEE technical societies

If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh 18:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chow-liu.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Common-effect.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Concept tree.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devarim Zutta

The article Devarim Zutta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very short article without any references and unclear context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ASCIIMathML

The article ASCIIMathML has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article shows no sign of notability. I can find some webpages that use it, but no in-depth coverage outside of the authors' websites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 06:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Hoffman (filmmaker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hoffman (filmmaker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hoffman (filmmaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 20:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dfass. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Ḥarizi listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Al-Ḥarizi. Since you had some involvement with the Al-Ḥarizi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PesiḲ. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PesiḲ.. Since you had some involvement with the PesiḲ. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dfass. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dfass. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dfass. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Version space box.png

The file File:Version space box.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midrash Yeshaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midrash Yeshaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midrash Yeshaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"D. Hoffmann" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect D. Hoffmann. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20#D. Hoffmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Biblical literature" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Biblical literature and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 1 § Biblical literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 09:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]