User talk:Devite

Welcome!

Hello, Devite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- WikHead (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Highland Council page

Wow. Devite, much thanks for changing those results boxes, that's not an easy task! I c+p'd the 2008 article across so just left things 'as were' other than candidates. doktorb _words^deeds 13:49, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just felt that the pages should all look like Aberdeenshire and Perth and Kinross as we will have data about counts. By the way do you post on the Vote UK Discussion Forum in the Scottish section? I posted there as Irishobserver. Would you have a look at the Moray page for 2012 local elections. It is not showing up on the main Scottish Local Elections, 2012 page for some reason despite being in the Politics of Moray. It doesn't seem to be linked in properly. Devite (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Council election results

Hi - I see that you've changed the summary of results on the East Dunbartonshire Council election, 2012 article (and possibly others) to reflect the 2007 result, rather than the standings following by-elections. Could you explain the rationale for this - the media have generally reported the "overnight" change in seats, rather than the change since the last full election. I'm not saying you've done something wrong, just different, and we may need to explain any differences between the article and published results (by putting an explanation in the article) if we're using a different comparison process. An example might be:

This table uses the 2007 election as a baseline as this is the last full data set for comparison. Tables of election-night changes published elsewhere may differ if by-election results are included in the baseline.

Wikiwayman (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi, in advance of the local elections I was updating the 2007 elections pages to ensure that all by-elections were recorded and, as best as possible, that all resignations from parties were noted also. However, I still feel that in comparing how a party(ies) have performed in an election compared to a previous one that the last comparable result should be used i.e 2007. The 2007 page of each council will (hopefully) accurately inform the reader of how the internal dynamics of that council changed between 2007 and 2012. I have been trying to have a consistent approach for the other councils I have done to date. That's the sole reason I edited the summary of results table you had written. I'm happy to debate this further with others. Devite (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the approach you've taken is probably the best one from a statistical point of view and also for consistency. My concern was more with fact-checkers who may compare the table in the article with this one at the BBC News website. Wikipedia has an undeserved popular reputation for not being accurate, while the BBC is undoubtedly reputable, so my suggestion was simply posed to explain the differences. All that would be required is to cut-and-paste the line into each article, but before I do that, I'm keen on getting consensus as you've put a lot of good work in and I don't necessarily know why everything is the way it is. Wikiwayman (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My background is in statistics and so thats partly why I approached it in this fashion. I agree consistency is important but again feel free to broaden out the discussion to other other users if you want. I was surprised the BBC adopted that approached. In Ireland, for example, while people might defect to different parties between an election the last comparable result would be compared with the most recent one both at local and at national level. Devite (talk) 10:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can we agree to combine our thoughts - i.e., we'll use your statistical basis, but add my explanatory note? I'm happy to do the editing. Wikiwayman (talk) 11:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree to that. Devite (talk) 11:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Devite, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for all your hard work on articles relating to Scottish politics – keep it up! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy

Excuse me. You asked me a question. Was it insincere or did you care at all about my reply? I see you have completely ignored my objection.— O'Dea (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 26 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Irish local elections, 1999 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Irish local elections, 2004 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Monaghan County Council election, 1999

Hi, I'm Hashima20. Devite, thanks for creating Monaghan County Council election, 1999!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It's a not bad article. It just needs references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Hashima20 (talk) 23:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, Hashima. It was my intention that when I had completed a few more Irish local authority election pages that I would then add in some references and commentary on the election. Devite (talk) 13:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Meath County Council election, 1999

Hi, I'm Denimadept. Devite, thanks for creating Meath County Council election, 1999!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Greetings. This article needs inline citations, and a References section to put them in.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Denimadept (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Just wanted to say well done for creating all the articles on local elections in Ireland. Number 5 7 23:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was also wondering whether you might want to consider creating templates for the county elections, rather than using the succession boxes (so, for example, having something like {{Bristol elections}} or {{Isle of Wight elections}}). This has the added benefit of highlighting the years for which articles are missing. Cheers, Number 5 7 23:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sligo County Council

No problemo. Just making sure. CivisHibernius (talk) 00:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Renfrewshire Council election, 2012 page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the North Ayrshire Council election, 2012 page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Devite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent articles...

I've been patrolling some of your recent articles and they look really good so I've nominated you for Autopatrolled status. The only point for improvement that sprang out at me was the lack of any projects on the articles' talk pages. Talk:Aberdeen City Council election, 2017 shows the two projects which seem appropriate. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 09:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Devite, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 09:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For the Scottish council elections. Crazyseiko (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Devite. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Devite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Devite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the 2014 South Dublin County Council election

Hi there, I see that you've been adding a lot to the 2014 South Dublin County Council election article (looks like very good work). But I found the system you were using to mark changes since the last election with those crosses to be very convoluted and hard to follow. So I went ahead and changed the crosses into a proper note system (you just have to put your note inside a double brackets with the code "efn" (Template:Efn), like this {{efn|NOTE TEXT HERE}}, then you create a "Notes" section at the bottom with {{notelist}}). In future you should probably try to use a system like that. Anyway, the only other issue with the article now is that I don't know what the asterisks mean, which are next to some people's names. What does this imply? It needs to be explained somewhere (either in the text or in a note). Thanks. Hibernian (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Sorry - my recent revert was completely uncalled for, I'm afraid I got a bit confused about what I was looking at there. Apologies for the disruption. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A quick word of thanks

Hi Devite, just wanted to say a huge word of thanks for all your doing, particularly the 1985 Irish local elections. I know filling in election results can often feel like a thankless task but it is most certainly appreciated. Any free time I have at the moment is spent on the 1992 Irish general election but if I can be of any assistance please don't hesitate to reach out. ElectionHack2019 (talk) 22:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Aberdeenshire Council election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of people with epilepsy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of people with epilepsy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of people with epilepsy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of people with epilepsy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I see you have been working on some health-related articles recently, and I want to invite you to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if it's a subject area that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of people with epilepsy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of people with epilepsy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pádraig McNally for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pádraig McNally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pádraig McNally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iveagh Gardens (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dundalk page

Hi, I'm sure your addition to the Dundalk page is correct, it still requires citation to be accepted by editors. 'Well known' is not evidence. Sexitoni (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Declan Breathnach

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Declan Breathnach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]