User talk:Devios

The article Furlong (band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 06:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grapefruit Seed Extract It is amazing how much play this article has gotten.

Feel free to jump in on the ACTION about GSE if you know the facts. Discuss, talk, and have fun fellow wikipedian. Good Luck!

However, next time you add info onto wikipedia's website do not use copyrighted info from Judith Sims about GSE. Thank You. Copyrighted info is illegal without express wtritten consent. You made no reference that you obtained written permission from Judith Sims.

I appreciate the encouragement to take part in the GSE page although if you look at my initial addition to the page I did in fact list Judith Sims as a reference, the first reference. None of the information I obtained from the short article that Judith Sims wrote was plagerized - merely reiterated the same general information, which last time I checked wasn't illegal. Please sign your name when making an addition to my talk page, that way it's easier to get back in touch with you instead of floundering around on the pages history. Devios 00:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EwoodGSE.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EwoodGSE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Polar Bears (band)

I have nominated Polar Bears (band), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar Bears (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 10:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Music scene

The article Music scene has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's little point on keeping the page as a disambiguation, since there's just one link. Redirecting it to the link is also quite biased, as Jimthing pointed out. Unless a better way to solve the problem is found (such as expandind the definition of the term), the article should be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 22:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]