Jump to content

User talk:Devinbounds/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

INSTRUCTOR COMMENT

[edit]

Please remember that your reading of this will depend on your presentation of the petroleum geology. Other aspects of the oil field are simply a bonus but the emphasis must be on the geology which you have barely started so it's very hard to give much sensible advice. Please make sure to provide details of the tectonic setting of the basin in question, and the age of stratigraphy which probably ought to be covered by some type of diagram or table as well as clear explanations and detailed information about the source, seal, reservoir and trapping mechanism. essentially at the moment you just have one rather short paragraph but I would expect enough geological content to fill around two computer pages. Pclift (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Student Review

[edit]

The information that is present thus far is of high quality, however, I think that you need to add more information that provides insight about the petroleum geology of the oil field. Perhaps you could talk more about the depositional history, formation characteristics, stratigraphy, etc. You should also address what the source, reservoir and trap are.

You should put an "introduction" section prior to your location section that consists of just a few sentences that provides a general overview of the page.

You may be able to combine your "discovery" and "production" sections into one section (maybe call it "production history"?) that talks about both of these topics. You may also be able to include your information from the "working interest partners" section as that quite a short section and you probably do not need to have so many sections devoted to production, as this project is supposed to be more focused on the petroleum geology.

Lastly, I think it would also be helpful if you were to provide more pictures or figures to go along with the page. A map of the field, a stratigraphic cross section and maybe some charts/graphs that convey information about production history or something similar could go a long way in making the page more aesthetically pleasing.

BradleyBordelon (talk) 20:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]