User talk:Devil's Advocate~enwiki
I have written an article for the book Hail Satan which is a collection of Satanic poetry. A christian user on Wikipedia seems upset and zealous in his efforts to have the article deleted. He has accused the article of vanity, whereas the article reads unbiased. The user in question also argues notability, yet the traffic log for the article since May shows over 1,000 visits. The article has also been accused of lacking sources, yet since this accusation proper sources have been added. The behavioral pattern however is arbitrary meaning when vanity is addressed and leveled - notability is argued, when notability is addressed and leveled - sources are argued. On the surface this seems less to do with an encyclopedic article's pertinence to Satanism and the Occult and rather the concern of christian users on Wikipedia to silence modern representations of Satanism in literature. I want to reach out to you in assuming unbiased concern and ask for your input and participation in the discussion of this article's deletion. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hail_Satan_(book) Blackson 22:03:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Devil's Advocate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Devil's Advocate~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
12:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Rumjal listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rumjal. Since you had some involvement with the Rumjal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Rumjal listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rumjal. Since you had some involvement with the Rumjal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 06:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)