User talk:Devetakapija

Welcome!

Hello, Devetakapija, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!

I will ask you questions if I have any.

Kind regards,

Dusan Devetakapija (talk) 11:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://ljubisabojic.com/, https://ifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/dt_team/bojic-ljubisa/?lang=en, https://ljubisabojic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Ljubisa-Bojic-2022.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ljubisa Bojic may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rich,

Please see that all above noted content is now is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Please browse to the bottom of the following pages to see the licence:

https://ljubisabojic.com/

https://ljubisabojic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Ljubisa-Bojic-2022.pdf

Could you please indicate which exact segments you think should be changed. I tried to write my own (original) text, not to take from pages that were linked to. Also, the photo is marked by the above noted licence.

Kind Regards,

Dusan Devetakapija (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Devetakapija! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://ljubisabojic.com/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ljubisa Bojic may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ljubisa Bojic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ljubisa Bojic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines nor WP:NPROF. Almost every single source here is a primary source affiliated with the subject, featuring the subject speaking or being interviewed, or is written by the subject.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, university/company websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Ljubisa Bojic.

Examples include: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Ljubisa Bojic specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Ljubisa Bojic; television and radio features ABOUT Ljubisa Bojic.

Frankly, if the subject isn’t passing WP:NPROF they may not be eligible for an encyclopedic article.

Also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources are.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Ljubisa Bojic to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ljubisa Bojic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ljubisa Bojic

Hello, Devetakapija. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ljubisa Bojic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ljubisa Bojic

Hello, Devetakapija. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ljubisa Bojic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ljubisa Bojic moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ljubisa Bojic, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With only one exception (where he is commenting on AI), all the sources are primary, and therefore insufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG. I don't see anything there which obviously would make him notable per WP:NACADEMIC, either, but if this is what's being asserted then please point out clearly which criterion of that guideline is met and what evidence supports such an assertion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ljubisa Bojic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not notable, as commented before.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ljubisa Bojic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ljubisa Bojic (December 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is constantly present in the media throughout South-Eastern Europe to comment on the social impact of AI as a scientist who does research. This can be seen through the new links that have been added. The subject scientific paper published in one of the top future studies journals has been accessed 15K times, as it offers novel ideas and analysis of highly important topics related to AI and the metaverse: https://eujournalfuturesresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40309-022-00208-4

Also, the subject had been appointed by the chief scientist of UNEP to the foresight panel preparing recommendations for the next General Assembly of the United Nations: https://www.unep.org/ocs/foresight-expert-panel

The subject has published a book, many scientific papers, and has been interviewed many times by mainstream media. According to this, I think the subject is not sufficiently notable. I think the decision should be reconsidered and that this page should be published. Devetakapija (talk) 10:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, I cannot see how the subject is not sufficiently notable. On the contrary, I think it is. Devetakapija (talk) 10:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]