User talk:Devadee

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Devadee/sandbox (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Devadee/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Devadee/sandbox (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Devadee/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Devadee, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Devadee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion

Hi Paul, Wikipedia might be open source, but cannot be used for promotional purposes for your own DVDs please and the way they are being shoe-horned into other encyclopedia articles is frankly unacceptable. Much as I understand you wish to establish yourself as a film-maker, unless they receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", they don't meet the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia:Notability (films). Just being available on Amazon and listed on IMDb isn't considered sufficient for inclusion. Bob talk 23:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Shuck has been identified as vandalism and reverted by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Black Shuck was changed by Devadee (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92886 on 2014-02-21T23:23:00+00:00 . ClueBot NG (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Shuck (2012 film)

Hello Devadee,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black Shuck (2012 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Reedman72 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Paul T T Easter, Stagger (film 2009) and Black Shuck (2012 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Ruby Murray 22:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Easter. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]