User talk:DeusExa

Hello, DeusExa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

By the way, do you know about the show preview button? It's to the right of the save page button. Let me know on my talk page if you need any help or anything.

Again, welcome! delldot | talk 02:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:TempleCity4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TempleCity4.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:TempleCity1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TempleCity1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Stanford alumni who have founded technology companies

I'm requesting discussion of whether to preserve this sentence in the Stanford University article on the talk page:

Stanford faculty and alumni have founded many prominent technology companies, including Cisco Systems, Electronic Arts, Google, Hewlett-Packard, LinkedIn, Sun Microsystems, and Yahoo!.

I would appreciate your comments. Msnicki (talk) 01:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Your behavior is being discussed here. Msnicki (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at WP:AN3#User:DeusExa reported by User:Msnicki (Result: ) and explain why you should not be blocked for edit warring at Stanford University. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot consider the merits of your edit if you're unwilling to explain it. You've been requested now at least twice to discuss the edit, either at Talk:Stanford University or at the noticeboard discussion about your edits. Continuing to delete the text without explanation is not constructive; further such instances will be dealt with as disruptive editing, which will likely lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are back to your edit warring. You have once again removed the disputed material from Stanford University without explanation. The consensus at the talk page has been to keep this material. If you continue to remove it, against consensus and without explanation, you may be subject to sanctions as explained above. --MelanieN (talk) 14:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Twitter. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 17:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]