User talk:Detective81

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Private Investigative Services and Licensure in Massachusetts

A tag has been placed on Private Investigative Services and Licensure in Massachusetts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Service and Licensure of Private Investigators in Illinois

A tag has been placed on Service and Licensure of Private Investigators in Illinois requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Private investigator has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 22:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Private Investigator Service and Licensure in Massachusetts constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. sanawon 22:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "1949 World Ice Hockey Championships"

A page you created, 1949 World Ice Hockey Championships, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 22:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Private investigator. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Northeast Surveillance Services. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 23:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Northeast Surveillance Services

A tag has been placed on Northeast Surveillance Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 12:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast Surveillance Services

A tag has been placed on Northeast Surveillance Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Northeast Surveillance Services and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 16:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Detective81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not think this block is fair. I am trying to write a series of articles about private investigative services accross the world. These articles are not directories but discussions on licesure issues and regional, private investigative, trade methods. I would hope; instead of blocking me, you would help me write these articles since I am somewhat bussy this month. Detective81

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring, that is, fighting over a revision to a page with another user. You can't do that here. You also don't appear to recognize that that's not an acceptable practice here. In the future, I would suggest discussing the changes you'd like to make, with the other editor, of someone reverts you, instead of just going back and forth with them. — SQL ^{Query me!} 18:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

About the block

I do not think this block is fair. I am trying write articles about private investigative services accross the world. These articles are not directories but discussions on licesure issues. I would hope instead of blocking you would help me write this articles, since I am somewhat bussy this month. Detective81.

I have blocked you again for the same offence for edit warring on the Private Investigator article. If you wish to contest the block, please use the {{unblock}} template. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 20:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast Surveillance Services and variants

Please can you stop creating articles about this company. It does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for companies and your repeated and deliberate evasion of article title protection in order to advertise your organisation is at the point where it could be considered to be disruptive editing and if you continue will lead very swiftly to you being blocked from editing again. Please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not a directory. Kind regards, nancy ^(talk) 06:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Private Investigator Service and Licensure in Massachusetts

The article Private Investigator Service and Licensure in Massachusetts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TRIVIA

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phearson (talk) 04:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]